Abstract

In recent years the problem of defining religion has returned to center stage in the discipline of Religious Studies. For most of the postwar period, the so-called ' sui generis model ' for religion generally prevailed. This paper argues that disputes over the shape and function of the liturgy, and over the authority to control it, offer an important window into the early modern development of a concept of religion closely akin to the sui generis' view. It argues that evidence from the 1540s and 1550s supports historicist critiques of the sui generis view, though it also suggests that such critiques must be further nuanced. The concepts of adiaphora and of resistance theory suggest that one can and should see early modern events as illuminating moments in the development of the modern, commonsense, sui generis notion of religion. Keywords: adiaphora; resistance theory; sui generis religion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.