Abstract

A hallmark of cancer is dysregulated protein turnover (proteostasis), which involves pathologic ubiquitin-dependent degradation of tumor suppressor proteins, as well as increased oncoprotein stabilization. The latter is due, in part, to mutation within sequences, termed degrons, which are required for oncoprotein recognition by the substrate-recognition enzyme, E3 ubiquitin ligase. Stabilization may also result from the inactivation of the enzymatic machinery that mediates the degradation of oncoproteins. Importantly, inactivation in cancer of E3 enzymes that regulates the physiological degradation of oncoproteins, results in tumor cells that accumulate multiple active oncoproteins with prolonged half-lives, leading to the development of “degradation-resistant” cancer cells. In addition, specific sequences may enable ubiquitinated proteins to evade degradation at the 26S proteasome. While the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway was originally discovered as central for protein degradation, in cancer cells a ubiquitin-dependent protein stabilization pathway actively translates transient mitogenic signals into long-lasting protein stabilization and enhances the activity of key oncoproteins. A central enzyme in this pathway is the ubiquitin ligase RNF4. An intimate link connects protein stabilization with tumorigenesis in experimental models as well as in the clinic, suggesting that pharmacological inhibition of protein stabilization has potential for personalized medicine in cancer. In this review, we highlight old observations and recent advances in our knowledge regarding protein stabilization.

Highlights

  • A subgroup of internal degrons is recognized by Cullin-based RING ubiquitin ligases and includes Skp-Cullin-F-box ubiquitin ligase complexes (SCF), where the F-box protein serves as a receptor subunit that binds to a phosphorylated degron via its C-terminal WD40 domain

  • It is possible that in addition to the structural barrier, the type of ubiquitin chains generated by the E2/E3, potentially together with ancillary factors at the proteasome level, may determine the exact outcome: complete destruction or limited proteolysis

  • RNF4 acts upstream to the secondary destabilizing phosphorylations and the ubiquitin enzymes involved in the physiological degradation of these oncogenic substrates (e.g., E2 and E3)

Read more

Summary

Overview

The dynamic stability of proteins, which is a fundamental concept in biology, was discovered by Rudolph Schonheimer [1] It is, well known that proteomes exhibit a wide range of protein half-lives [2]. A central system that mediates ATP-dependent degradation of proteins is the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS; [4,5,6]). Protein stability depends on intrinsic structures within the targeted proteins, called degrons, as well as on enzymes that mediate the ubiquitination of the protein substrate. Depends on the type of ubiquitin chains catalyzed onstabilization, the protein substrates. A ubiquitin-dependent protein stabilization pathway actively stabilizes proteins. We discuss cases of protein stabilization that result from mutations in degrons or that mediate the degradation of these proteins. We focus on cases of protein inactivation of thestem enzymes mediate the degradation of these proteins.

Evading Recognition I
Evading Recognition II
Evading the Proteasome
Ubiquitin-Dependent Oncoprotein Stabilization
Heterotypic Ubiquitin Chains Mediate Protein Stabilization
Ubiquitin-Dependent Stabilization Is Evolutionarily Conserved
The Tumor-Promoting Activity of RNF4
Findings
10. Implications of RNF4 and Ubiquitin-Dependent Protein Stabilization in Cancer
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call