Abstract
Yrjo Engestrom (2014) describes three “generations” of activity theory. First was Vygotsky’s work, which was centered around the concept of mediation, but limited to individuals or dyads. Second was Leontiev’s development of the theory, which introduced the unit of analysis (labor activity) and expanded it to apply to groups. Third was the work of Engestrom and others in the West, who expanded the theory to address multiple interacting activity systems. The story is that of linear development and expansion of Vygotsky’s fundamental psychological insights to address broader social systems. Yet that development has not been linear at all. In each generation of activity theory, the extraordinary – the remarkable phenomenon that provides the center of gravity of the theory’s development – has changed. In this chapter, I examine the development of the extraordinary across the three generations of activity theory, identifying key inflection points in this development. I conclude by discussing implications for developing activity theory further.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.