Abstract
In the field of art and design, it is an accepted norm for the marketplace’s art appraisers to use subjective assessment in determining the quality of an artwork. Inherently, such subjective mode of judgmental practice is also somewhat formalized and being brought into the art education. The use of subjective assessment in the context of art is touted to have better validity among the practitioners, as the work of art has a unique emotional context that cannot be assessed in a fixated manner. However, from the perspective of institutional ranking purposes, the use of subjective assessment is posed to have a reliability issue, for it cannot objectively differentiate students’ performance from the norms and the goods. In spite of the fact that art is customarily to be appraised subjectively, this paper would like to share that the work of art can be evaluated objectively, through the adoption of criteria-marking scheme that is techno-rational centric.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
