Abstract
ABSTRACT Star ratings on P2P accommodation platforms are highly positive. Such biases have led many users to utilise selective processing strategies to evaluate the textual content of online reviews. However, when many reviews are available for a product or a service, these strategies would be suboptimal at best, posing several challenges to the users of peer-to-peer (P2P) accommodation platforms. To enable the guests to perform more informed evaluations and overcome the challenges that the skewed distribution of star ratings creates for decision-making, we employ content analysis tools to derive an aggregated sentiment score for each listing. Using this score, we define a new measure, called “sentiment rating”, that compares a listing with other similar listings based on their textual reviews. Our choice-based conjoint experiment suggests that unlike users’ initial perception about the function of star rating as the most salient factor in evaluating P2P listings, users actually attribute more importance to sentiment ratings of P2P accommodations. Therefore, a text-based summary of online reviews would indeed help users in evaluating alternatives on a P2P platform and in decision making. We argue that a text-based quantitative summary of user reviews could be a useful supplements to (or substitutes for) star ratings on P2P accommodation platforms and even online retailing websites.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
