Abstract

An automated, simulation-based aircraft design process allows for the prediction of unanticipated problems early inthe design stage, leading to reduced turn-around time and development cost. Having reliable, and affordable (fast)design tools is crucial to achieving this level of automation in design process. An example of this is illustrated fora jet trainer aircraft using two aircraft design codes: Jet Designer and CEASIOM. A set of aerodynamic methodswith different degrees of fidelity and computational expense is considered, with the limitations of each methodprovided. In particular, this paper examines the challenges that CFD-based aircraft design poses to a designer,including: a) the cost of generation of large data tables, b) the automated handling of geometry, c) treating controlsurface deflections, d) and calculation of dynamic derivatives using CFD. A Kriging-based sampling approachwas used for generating aerodynamic tables with a reasonable computational cost compared with a brute-forceapproach. For Euler calculations, an automated CAD and mesh generation approach from a geometry descriptionwas used. It is demonstrated that application of Euler solutions to low fidelity aircraft geometry shows the expecteddesign trends. Also, results show that the wave drag at transonic speeds can be predicted with Euler equations, butnot with vortex lattice or Digital DATCOM. The treatment of control surface deflections was also investigated forthe vortex lattice solver and the Euler code. Transpiration boundary condition approach was used in the Euler codeto model the flap surface movements, although this approach is limited to small control surface deflections. Thecalculated aero tables form each aero source were used next to study the vehicle flying qualities. Results presenteddemonstrate the validity and feasibility of the simulation-based approach for aircraft conceptual design.

Highlights

  • The aircraft design process consists of three main phases: a) conceptual, b) preliminary, and c) detailed design (Brandt et al, 2004)

  • This paper examines the challenges that CFD-based aircraft design poses to a designer, including: a) the cost of generation of large data tables, b) the automated handling of geometry, c) treating control surface deflections, d) and calculation of dynamic derivatives using CFD

  • A number of problems need to be addressed for the routine use of CFD for conceptual design: a) the cost of generation of large data tables (Ghoreyshi et al, 2009), b) the automated handling of geometry (Berard et al, 2008), c) treating control surface deflections (Da Ronch et al, 2011), d) and calculation of dynamic derivatives (Da Ronch et al, 2012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aircraft design process consists of three main phases: a) conceptual, b) preliminary, and c) detailed design (Brandt et al, 2004). The development of a reliable computational tool for prediction of these important issues would allow the designers to screen different configurations prior to building the first prototype, reducing overall cost and limiting risks This provides motivation to move towards CFD simulations based on the state-of-the-art computer-aided concept, since this approach, in principle, has few limitations related to geometry. A number of problems need to be addressed for the routine use of CFD for conceptual design: a) the cost of generation of large data tables (Ghoreyshi et al, 2009), b) the automated handling of geometry (Berard et al, 2008), c) treating control surface deflections (Da Ronch et al, 2011), d) and calculation of dynamic derivatives (Da Ronch et al, 2012). Aero tables are generated and used to study the vehicle flying qualities

Geometry
Jet Designer
Digital DATCOM
Vortex Lattice Solver
EDGE Solver
Cobalt Solver
Surrogate-Based Generation of Aerodynamic Tables
Calculation of Dynamic Derivatives Using CFD
Test Case
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.