From Sovereignty to Process: The Jurisprudence of Federalism after Garcia

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessFrom Sovereignty to Process: The Jurisprudence of Federalism after GarciaAndrzej RapaczynskiAndrzej Rapaczynski Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Supreme Court Review Volume 19851985 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/scr.1985.3109503 Views: 21Total views on this site Citations: 7Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1986 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Mark C. Gordon Differing Paradigms, Similar Flaws: Constructing a New Approach to Federalism in the United States, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.446581Steven G. Gey The Myth of State Sovereignty, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.299943Robert P. Inman, Daniel L. Rubinfeld Subsidiarity and the European Union, (Jan 2017): 1944–1950.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_367Seth F. Kreimer Federalism and Freedom, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 574, no.11 (Sep 2016): 66–80.https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620157400105Matthew D. Adler State Sovereignty and the Anti-Commandeering Cases, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 574, no.11 (Sep 2016): 158–172.https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620157400112Peter Newman S, (Jan 1998): 395–559.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_4Peter C. Ordeshook, Olga Shvetsova If Hamilton and Madison were merely lucky, what hope is there for Russian federalism?, Constitutional Political Economy 6, no.22 (Jun 1995): 107–126.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303252