Abstract
ObjectivesPrisons in Scotland were one of the few workplaces exempt from the 2006 comprehensive smoking ban in indoor public places, excluding the prison workforce from the health benefits of smokefree workplaces. The November 2018 introduction of comprehensive restrictions on smoking in Scottish prisons aimed to protect prison staff and people in custody from the harmful impacts of second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure. This study presents SHS exposure data gathered after smokefree policy implementation and compares these with data gathered during and before policy development.MethodsDylos DC1700 monitors were used to measure concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) derived from SHS across Scotland’s 15 prisons. Six days of fixed-site monitoring (09.00 22 May 2019 to 09.00 28 May 2019) were conducted in residential halls in each prison 6 months post-smokefree policy implementation. Prison staff task-based measurements were conducted to assess concentrations of SHS in various locations (e.g. gyms and workshops) and during specific activities (e.g. cell searches, maintenance, and meal service). Utilizing the fixed-site monitoring data, typical daily PM2.5 exposure profiles were constructed for the prison service and time-weighted average (TWA) exposure concentrations were estimated for the typical shift patterns of residential staff pre- and post-smokefree policy implementation. Staff perceptions of changes to SHS exposure were assessed using online surveys.ResultsAnalysis of both fixed-site and mobile task-based PM2.5 measurements showed the smokefree policy implementation was successful in reducing SHS exposures across the Scottish prison estate. Measured PM2.5 in residential halls declined markedly; median fixed-site concentrations reduced by more than 91% compared with measures in 2016 before policy announcement. The changes in the TWA concentrations across shifts (over 90% decrease across all shifts) and task-based measurements (89% average decrease for high-exposure tasks) provide evidence that prison staff exposure to SHS has significantly reduced. Following smokefree policy implementation, the majority of staff reported no longer being exposed to SHS at work.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive international study to objectively measure SHS levels before, during, and after implementation of a smokefree policy across a country’s prison system. The findings confirm that such a policy change can be successfully implemented to eliminate occupational exposures to SHS. The results are highly relevant for other jurisdictions considering changes to prison smoking legislation.
Highlights
In 2006, Scotland became one of the first countries in the world to introduce comprehensive legislation on smokefree indoor public places (Scottish Parliament, 2005), to protect workers and the public from exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS)
Results in context of previous literature These final Tobacco in Prisons (TIPs) (Phase 3) SHS exposure measures show the large decline in measured PM2.5 during the week of policy implementation (Semple et al, 2020) was maintained 6 months later, with fine particulate emissions generated from smoking activity reduced to close to zero
The large (91%) median reduction in PM2.5 6 months post-ban compared with levels in phase in: November–December 2016 (Phase 1) is comparable to studies conducted around the introduction of smokefree public places legislation in Scotland in 2006, when levels of measured PM2.5 in bars declined by 86% (Semple et al, 2007)
Summary
In 2006, Scotland became one of the first countries in the world to introduce comprehensive legislation on smokefree indoor public places (Scottish Parliament, 2005), to protect workers and the public from exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS). Evaluation of this law demonstrated that SHS concentrations in pubs and bars, key targets of the legislation, fell by 86% following implementation (Ayres et al, 2009). Prisons often house a mix of populations in respect of sex, remanded or convicted status and sentence length; 14 of the 15 are ‘closed’ establishments Those housed within the only ‘open’ prison can work within the community and are permitted some home leave prior to release.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
