Abstract

AbstractWorldwide, many productive rivers are dam‐regulated and rely on flow management strategies that must balance support of ecological processes with human water use. One component of evaluating this balance is to understand ecological consequences of alternative flow management strategies, which has often been accomplished by coupling population dynamics models with models that relate streamflow to habitat availability and quality. Numerous methods assign habitat availability to locations within a river basin: These include fine‐scale field‐measured values that are extrapolated to other locations within the basin having similar physical characteristics or equation‐driven values created by functions of model‐predicted values of physical characteristics. The array of options for creating habitat models is evolving rapidly as high‐resolution remote‐sensing data becomes more accessible and computational capacity improves. Our objective was to identify trade‐offs among approaches that assign habitat relationships to large rivers and to create a decision support tool to supplement choices of extent and granularity. Using a selection of case studies that represent a breadth of scales and diverse trade‐offs, we demonstrate the need for a transparent process of data evaluation and assessment to determine the appropriate fit for model scope or context that best supports management needs and recognize sources of uncertainty. The structured approach proposed here aims at improving future model development and refine population dynamics models that inform the management of rivers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call