Abstract

Reviewed by: From Shtetl to Stardom: Jews and Hollywood ed. by Michael Renov, Vincent Brook Marat Grinberg (bio) From Shtetl to Stardom: Jews and Hollywood. Edited by Michael Renov and Vincent Brook. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2017. xvi + 190 pp. There is something peculiar about American Jewish identity and its representation on page and screen. Despite the enormous success of Jews in America, there remains a crisis of belonging, a persistent fear of the threat coming from the surrounding world and hence discomfort with revealing one’s Jewishness. The new noteworthy volume From Shtetl to Stardom: Jews and Hollywood revisits this peculiarity and how it plays out in contemporary American cinema, television, and comedy. The histories and case studies presented in it provide a rich interpretation of new material and a fresh reinterpretation of familiar paradigms. The volume brings together—and therein lies its novelty—both scholars and industry insiders, such as writers and producers. The dense theoretical analysis of some pieces is juxtaposed with anecdotes and personal observations of others. As Michael Renov and Vincent Brook rightly claim in the editors’ introduction, “Rather than take a primary historical, theoretical, biographical, or insider approach, as have most other studies of Jews and entertainment, ours combines differing approaches in overlapping and innovative ways” (xii). There’s truly much of interest here for everyone. [End Page 589] From Shtetl to Stardom begins with “Histories” and Brook’s thorough overview of the Jews’ place in Hollywood. As he concludes, “Along with the undeniable persistence of Jewish executive predominance, a quick web search reveals that the media control canard, with antisemitic overtones intact, also maintains a hold on the public imagination” (16). One wonders how the revelations which took down Harvey Weinstein and brought about the “Me Too” movement, putting Jewish masculinity under scrutiny in some circles, contribute to this “hold.” The section continues with provocative responses to Ben Urwand’s deeply controversial book, Collaboration: Hollywood’s Pact with Hitler (2013), by Lawrence Baron, Joel Rosenberg and Brook. Baron delivers a harsh and astute assessment, largely echoed by both Rosenberg and Brook, of Urwand’s accusation that studios consciously collaborated with Nazi Germany: “in the end, [Urwand] produces a smokescreen and not a smoking gun” (32). The volume’s second section—and its richest—is “Case Studies.” The theoretically sophisticated chapters by Shaina Hammerman and Joshua Moss are concerned with the most recent manifestations of Jewishness in comedy and television. Via the analysis of the persona and comedy of Amy Schumer, Hammerman draws the link between Schumer’s and other female comedians’ “parenthetical Jewish identity” and their “marginalized identity” as women (66). In contrast to the type of the Jewish loser propagated by male Jewish comedians, Schumer’s characters exhibit “hyper-confidence,” sexual permissiveness and unapologetic Jewishness, even when it’s not explicitly acknowledged (61). While Hammerman locates a liberating feminist critique in this paradigm, it is questionable whether Schumer’s recent turn in a much more mainstream direction can sustain this rebellious streak. In his analysis of Transparent, Moss similarly links Jewishness with another type of marginality: queer and transgender. He convincingly demonstrates how Transparent, “transcomedy,” both breaks with and continues in the footsteps of the sitcom genre, “transgressing” it (79). The last season of Transparent, which depicts the Pfeffermans’ trip to Israel, has been widely criticized for its simplistic portrayal of Israeli identity and the Palestinian issue; the revelations about Jeffrey Tambor’s indiscretions in the context of the “Me Too” movement have put a cloud over the show as well. Does this negate its earlier subversive politics outlined by Moss? Future studies will have to address this issue. In his short chapter, Howard Rodman, who wrote such notable films as Joe Gould’s Secret and August, offers a tribute to the Coen brothers’ A Serious Man. He sees a break between earlier heymish depictions of Jewishness and Judaism in American cinema and the Coens’ “less kind [End Page 590] . . . and far more compelling” take on it (104). The section ends with Jeffrey Shandler’s informative and personal chapter on Allan Sherman’s comedy from the 1960s. Attentive to how the once subversive becomes the norm, Shandler identifies Sherman’s satires...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.