Abstract

This chapter examines ACIM’s attempts to continue to circumvent National Origins quotas through lobbying for further refugee legislation after the expiration of the Refugee Relief Act. The Refugee Relief Program proved to be a politically palatable way to both increase Italian immigration opportunities and to whittle away at the effectiveness of the National Origins System. This chapter looks at the varying degrees of success Italian Americans had with these campaigns, the eventual unsustainable nature of their arguments, and their turn toward advancing arguments to regulate immigration on the basis of family unification by the turn of the decade. That pivot was part of a broader shift among liberals who similarly had begun to advance family reunification legislation as a more egalitarian and moral way to regulate immigration than the National Origins System. This chapter shows that Italian American immigration reformers took part in this shift because of a combination of genuine ideological convictions but also did so opportunistically when previous strategies for achieving immigration opportunities via special legislation for Italians failed. It argues for the self-interested nature of Italian American lobbying and suggests the limitations of white ethnic liberalism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.