Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation with massively parallel sequencing (ChIP-seq) iswidely used to identify the genomic binding sites for protein of interest. Most conventionalapproaches to ChIP-seq data analysis involve the detection of the absolutepresence (or absence) of a binding site. However, an alternative strategy is toidentify changes in the binding intensity between two biological conditions, i.e., differential binding (DB). This may yield more relevant results than conventional analyses,as changes in binding can be associated with the biological difference beinginvestigated. The aim of this article is to facilitate the implementation of DB analyses,by comprehensively describing a computational workflow for the detection ofDB regions from ChIP-seq data. The workflow is based primarily on R softwarepackages from the open-source Bioconductor project and covers all steps of theanalysis pipeline, from alignment of read sequences to interpretation and visualizationof putative DB regions. In particular, detection of DB regions will be conductedusing the counts for sliding windows from the csaw package, with statistical modellingperformed using methods in the edgeR package. Analyses will be demonstratedon real histone mark and transcription factor data sets. This will providereaders with practical usage examples that can be applied in their own studies.

Highlights

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq) is a popular technique for identifying the genomic binding sites of a target protein

  • differential binding (DB) analyses are easier to perform than their conventional counterparts, as the effect of genomic biases is largely mitigated when counts for different libraries are compared at the same genomic region

  • Reads

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq) is a popular technique for identifying the genomic binding sites of a target protein. A number of recent studies have focused on the detection of changes in the binding profile between conditions (Pal et al, 2013; Ross-Innes et al, 2012). These differential binding (DB) analyses involve counting reads into genomic intervals, and testing those counts for significant differences between conditions. This defines a set of putative DB regions for further examination. DB regions may be more relevant as the change in binding can be associated with the biological difference between conditions

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.