Abstract

The face is a significant locus of power upon which judgements concerning a person’s status, worth and attractiveness are made. This study contributes to knowledge of facial norms’ shifting performative power in daily organizing, theorizing facial beauty as a communicatively constituted authoritative text. We achieve this through blending Butlerian and communication as constitutive of organization (CCO) theorizing. This allows us to enrich understandings of power and performativity’s necessarily entangled and co-constitutive unfolding, as we trace how a normative understanding of facial beauty becomes more and/or less performatively powerful through embodied-textual processes. Our theorizing is generated from an ethnography of a UK cosmetics firm and demonstrates how facial beauty functions as a (figurative) authoritative text that corporealizes, subjectivizes and is resisted by makeup artists within a confluence of (concrete) text and conversation. We show how through communicative, citational and embodied processes of corporealization, regulation and subjection, everyday performances like makeup applications become performatively powerful on the ground level of interaction. Further, returning authoritative texts to their original figurative formulation uncovers something of how their transformative power shapes organizing’s ongoing accomplishment.

Highlights

  • The face is a significant locus of power upon which judgements concerning a person’s status, worth and attractiveness are made

  • We argue that communication as constitutive of organization (CCO) provides the means for addressing this issue by enabling us to track how a normative understanding of facial beauty materializes (Cooren, 2020) and functions as an authoritative text (Kuhn, 2008) as actors come to see and, if necessary, touch its varying transformational effects

  • We began the study by offering the following research question: How is a powerful norm/authoritative text of facial beauty performatively constituted through organizational communication? The study has addressed it by showing how a facial beauty norm acts as an authoritative text (Kuhn, 2008) that becomes more and/or less powerful through its materializing (Cooren, 2020) within conversation–text dialectics (Taylor et al, 1996)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The face is a significant locus of power upon which judgements concerning a person’s status, worth and attractiveness are made. This study contributes to knowledge of facial norms’ shifting performative power in daily organizing, theorizing facial beauty as a communicatively constituted authoritative text. We achieve this through blending Butlerian and communication as constitutive of organization (CCO) theorizing This allows us to enrich understandings of power and performativity’s necessarily entangled and co-constitutive unfolding, as we trace how a normative understanding of facial beauty becomes more and/or less performatively powerful through embodied-textual processes. Lukes’ (2004) seminal work described power’s manifestation through the metaphor of ‘faces’, indicating that power is something that is made present in various guises (or disguises) The face, it seems, is a significant locus of power upon which judgements concerning a person’s status, worth and attractiveness are made.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call