Abstract

In this paper I seek to show how cultural niche construction theory offers the potential to extend the human evolutionary story beyond the Pleistocene, through the Neolithic, towards the kind of very large-scale societies in which we live today. The study of the human past has been compartmentalised, each compartment using different analytical vocabularies, so that their accounts are written in mutually incompatible languages. In recent years social, cognitive and cultural evolutionary theories, building on a growing body of archaeological evidence, have made substantial sense of the social and cultural evolution of the genus Homo. However, specialists in this field of studies have found it difficult to extend their kind of analysis into the Holocene human world. Within southwest Asia the three or four millennia of the Neolithic period at the beginning of the Holocene represents a pivotal point, which saw the transformation of human society in the emergence of the first large-scale, permanent communities, the domestication of plants and animals, and the establishment of effective farming economies. Following the Neolithic, the pace of human social, economic and cultural evolution continued to increase. By 5000 years ago, in parts of southwest Asia and northeast Africa there were very large-scale urban societies, and the first large-scale states (kingdoms). An extension of cultural niche construction theory enables us to extend the evolutionary narrative of the Pleistocene into the Holocene, opening the way to developing a single, long-term, evolutionary account of human history.

Highlights

  • In this paper I seek to show how cultural niche construction theory offers the potential to extend the human evolutionary story beyond the Pleistocene, through the Neolithic, towards the kind of very large-scale societies in which we live today

  • As an archaeologist specializing in the Neolithic period in southwest Asia, I have been frustrated that most accounts of human evolution end with the emergence of Homo sapiens, or with the emergence of fully modern language, ‘art’, or ’modern’ human minds around 40,000–30,000 years ago

  • I am experimenting with cultural niche construction theory as a conceptual framework that allows us to develop an evolutionary narrative that crosses that Pleistocene-Holocene divide

Read more

Summary

Introduction: three strands twisted in one thread

As an archaeologist specializing in the Neolithic period in southwest Asia (the first three or four millennia of the Holocene, approximately 12,000–8000 years ago), I have been frustrated that most accounts of human evolution end with the emergence of Homo sapiens, or with the emergence of fully modern language, ‘art’, or ’modern’ human minds around 40,000–30,000 years ago. Most people think of the Neolithic in terms derived from Gordon Childe’s theory of a Neolithic revolution (Childe 1936). He defined it as a period of a kind with the industrial revolution, bringing about a social, economic and technological transformation. I see the process leading to and through the Neolithic as three strands that are twined together to make one thread; and that thread begins a long time before the Neolithic period Let me introduce these three strands and show how each tells part of a story that we can follow from at least the Middle PalaeolithicUpper Palaeolithic transition around 40,000 years ago. I will seek to set this major transformation process in an evolutionary framework

Intensification of subsistence strategies
22 Page 4 of 15
22 Page 6 of 15
A transformation of the cultural niche
22 Page 8 of 15
22 Page 10 of 15
Summary conclusion
22 Page 12 of 15
22 Page 14 of 15
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call