Abstract

The dismantling of the welfare state across the United Kingdom (and indeed a number of other Western industrialised democracies, such as Canada and the United States) and the reductions to welfare provisions and entitlements are having a detrimental impact on women's equality and safety. Towers and Walby argue that the recent cuts to welfare provision in the United Kingdom, particularly for women's services, could lead to increased levels of violence for women and girls. This paper makes the argument that female victims of domestic abuse experience violence on two levels: first, at the intimate/personal level through their relationship with an abuser and, second, at a structural level, through the state failing to provide adequate protection and provision for women who have experienced violence in intimate relationships. Using a specific example of post-violence community services delivered to both the children of women who have experienced domestic violence and the women themselves, this paper draws on empirical research carried out in 2010–2011 with London-based third-sector and public sector organisations delivering the Against Violence and Abuse Project ‘Community Group Programme’. We argue that the lack of services for women involved in, or exiting, a violent relationship can amount to state-sanctioned violence, if funding is withheld, or indeed, stretched to breaking point.

Highlights

  • The dismantling of the welfare state across the UK and the reductions to welfare provisions and entitlements, are having a detrimental impact on women’s equality and safety (Weis and Fine, 2000; Morrow, Hankivsky, and Varcoe, 2004; Vacchelli et al, 2015). Towers and Walby (2012) argue that the recent cuts to welfare provisions in the UK, for women’s services, could lead to increased levels of violence for women and girls (c.f. Laville, 2014)

  • A failure to fund programmes that have a proven track record of meeting these needs will impact mothers and children – and as Galtung and Hoivik (1971) suggest, may kill them slowly, and indirectly. These points around structural violence are pertinent in the light of the UK Coalition government’s ‘Big Society’ agenda10, which was at a crescendo at the point when the research was being carried out in 2009-2010

  • Three of the five main areas of action around the 'Big Society' agenda include: 1) Giving communities more powers, 2) Encouraging people to take an active role in their communities, and 3) Supporting co-ops, mutual, charities, and social enterprises

Read more

Summary

Middlesex University Research Repository

An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk. Sanders-McDonagh, Erin, Neville, Lucy and Nolas, Sevasti-Melissa (2016) From pillar to post: understanding the victimisation of women and children who experience domestic violence in an age of austerity. From Pillar to Post: Understanding the victimisation of women and children who experience domestic violence in an age of austerity

Introduction
The nature and scope of domestic violence
Situating domestic violence as structural violence
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.