Abstract
The law of the tendential fall in the profit rate provides the basis for a Marxist critique not only of neoliberalism but also of Keynesian anti-crises policies. This article argues that Okishio’s critique of the law, far from providing the definitive proof of its inconsistency, is undermined by a logical inconsistency and is based on the replacement of Marx’s notion of labour as value creating with conventional economics’ notion of labour as a cost. Further, the article introduces and uses dialectical logic to show that the law is both internally consistent and determinate.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
