Abstract

The cockroach is an established model in the study of locomotion control. While previous work has offered important insights into the interplay among brain commands, thoracic central pattern generators, and the sensory feedback that shapes their motor output, there remains a need for a detailed description of the central pattern generators' motor output and their underlying connectivity scheme. To this end, we monitored pilocarpine-induced activity of levator and depressor motoneurons in two types of novel in-vitro cockroach preparations: isolated thoracic ganglia and a whole-chain preparation comprising the thoracic ganglia and the subesophageal ganglion. Our data analyses focused on the motoneuron firing patterns and the coordination among motoneuron types in the network. The burstiness and rhythmicity of the motoneurons were monitored, and phase relations, coherence, coupling strength, and frequency-dependent variability were analyzed. These parameters were all measured and compared among network units both within each preparation and among the preparations. Here, we report differences among the isolated ganglia, including asymmetries in phase and coupling strength, which indicate that they are wired to serve different functions. We also describe the intrinsic default gait and a frequency-dependent coordination. The depressor motoneurons showed mostly similar characteristics throughout the network regardless of interganglia connectivity; whereas the characteristics of the levator motoneurons activity were mostly ganglion-dependent, and influenced by the presence of interganglia connectivity. Asymmetries were also found between the anterior and posterior homolog parts of the thoracic network, as well as between ascending and descending connections. Our analyses further discover a frequency-dependent inversion of the interganglia coordination from alternations between ipsilateral homolog oscillators to simultaneous activity. We present a detailed scheme of the network couplings, formulate coupling rules, and review a previously suggested model of connectivity in light of our new findings. Our data support the notion that the inter-hemiganglia coordination derives from the levator networks and their coupling with local depressor interneurons. Our findings also support a dominant role of the metathoracic ganglion and its ascending output in governing the anterior ganglia motor output during locomotion in the behaving animal.

Highlights

  • Insect hexapedal design is known to enable very stable and highly adaptable locomotion [1,2,3,4]

  • Before the application of pilocarpine, we observed either no activity or a motor output characterized by low burstiness, which usually did not persist for more than a few minutes before the preparation became quiescent

  • We characterized the burstiness and rhythmicity of the motor output recorded from homolog depressor and levator MNs in the three thoracic ganglia

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Insect hexapedal design is known to enable very stable and highly adaptable locomotion [1,2,3,4]. Levator MNs, but not depressor MNs, were found to fire in correlation with intersegmental signals recorded from the thoracic connectives of the deafferented cockroach, which led to the suggestion that levator premotor networks are centrally controlled [47] Based on these and other observations, including our own findings [(38) and references within], we have previously suggested a parsimonious connectivity model of the CPGs network in which levator interneurons (INs) are centrally controlled (i.e., directly by the hemisegmental oscillator which shares a common drive with homolog oscillators and is connected to neighboring oscillators by mutual inhibition), while the output of depressor INs is influenced by their neighboring levators and not directly and exclusively by the hemisegmental oscillator [38]. This work offers extensive data for a future comprehensive comparative studies of the main insect models used for electrophysiology-based locomotion control research in recent years: the cockroach, the stick insect, and the desert locust

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Neurophysiological Procedure
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call