Abstract
Increasing the prevalence of broadleaf trees in conifer-dominated production forests is a recommended means of improving habitat availability for broadleaf and mixed-forest species. The implications for biodiversity are often measured by contrasting broadleaf-conifer mixtures with conifer-dominated stands. However, few studies include broadleaf-dominated stands in these assessments. Here we contrasted the bird assemblages of even-aged production forests along a mixture gradient from Norway spruce (Picea abies) dominated, to birch (Betula spp.) dominated stands in southern Sweden. We conducted point count surveys of bird individuals exhibiting breeding behaviour within 30 stands varying from <0.5% to over 98.5% broadleaf by basal area. A total of 355 birds were detected, comprising 36 bird species, seven of which are classified as near threatened by the Swedish Red-list. Our results indicate i) a distinct shift in bird community composition linked to the percentage of broadleaf trees at stand and landscape scales, ii) significantly higher bird species richness, evenness, and abundance in stands with a higher proportion of birch, iii) higher bird abundance in birch-dominated stands than in mixtures, and iv) shifts in bird species guilds as related to stand basal area, the amount of shrubs in the understory, and quantities of dead wood. All of these results have implications for the ways in which production forest management could be altered to enhance avian diversity, and we discuss these with respect to the use of broadleaf versus mixed-species stands.
Highlights
Conserving forest ecosystems is critical to tackling global biodiver sity loss (Ceballos et al, 2017; IPBES, 2019)
Both protected forests and forests actively managed for the production of biomass and other goods and services are important for forest biodiversity (Lindenmayer and Franklin, 2002)
By increasing the proportion of broadleaf tree species in otherwise conifer-dominated stands, a wider range of bird species is likely to be supported by production forest habitats
Summary
Conserving forest ecosystems is critical to tackling global biodiver sity loss (Ceballos et al, 2017; IPBES, 2019). Despite widespread reliance on managed production forests for meeting conservation goals (Brockerhoff et al, 2017), these environments often diverge from natural forest conditions and the habitat requirements of many native species This can be due to differ ences in the anthropogenic disturbance regimes employed, tree species composition provided, and forest structures retained (Felton et al, 2016a). Current trends indicate that reliance on intensively managed production forests will continue to increase this century (Warman, 2014; Payn et al, 2015), which will further increase the distinction between natural forest conditions and those found in many production forests Countering these trends, there is growing international awareness of the potential biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits from diversifying silviculture (Felton et al, 2020a). Less inten sive silvicultural practices can provide greater structural complexity, small-scale variability (Kuuluvainen et al, 2012) and tree species di versity (Pretzsch et al, 2017) than the even-aged monocultures commonly used by intensive forestry, with expected benefits to habitat availability, and forest biodiversity (Lindenmayer and Franklin, 2002; Gustafsson et al, 2020)
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Abundance In Stands
Higher Bird Abundance
Stands In Southern Sweden
Quantities Of Dead Wood
Production Forest
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Forest Ecology and Management
Jul 1, 2022
Forest Ecology and Management
Jan 1, 2009
Media Konservasi
Oct 17, 2021
Forestry
Jan 1, 1996
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Aug 13, 2015
The Auk
Jul 1, 1997
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Jan 1, 1988
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
Mar 4, 2016
Global Ecology and Conservation
Nov 1, 2022
Ecosphere
Nov 1, 2015
Current Science
Jul 25, 2021
Environmental Entomology
Dec 7, 2015
African Journal of Ecology
Jul 13, 2016
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Feb 1, 2006
Regional Environmental Change
Mar 23, 2019
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023
Forest Ecology and Management
Dec 1, 2023