Abstract

BackgroundFor nearly two decades calls have been made to expand the role of midwives within maternity services in Australia. Although some progress has been made, it has been slow and, at system-wide level, limited. There are many barriers that prevent the expansion of midwifery-led services in Australia including funding arrangements for midwifery care, a lack of political will and resistance from powerful medical interest groups. The ongoing debate that exists about the evidence for the safety of midwifery-led care, particularly for the intrapartum phase, is likely to be an important reason why policy-makers are reluctant to implement system-wide reforms of maternity services.DiscussionThose opposed to the expansion of midwifery-led care argue that these services are only appropriate for low-risk women. They claim the evidence in support of midwifery-led care has too many holes in it to guarantee that services are safe for higher risk women. Midwifery advocates, however, argue there is no evidence to support the claim that midwifery-led services lead to poorer outcomes in any risk group. Despite this, funding for midwifery-led care outside hospitals remains limited. This article contends that calls for the system-wide expansion of midwifery-led care (such as through funding independently practising midwives) based on the available evidence are unlikely to succeed. There are too many methodological challenges in this area to ever "prove" that midwifery-led services are safe – except for the lowest risk women – and when there is doubt, policy-makers are likely to err on the side of caution.SummaryIn order to expand access to midwifery care, advocates should abandon the idea of system-wide reform for now. Instead, they should concentrate on implementing small-scale, locally based changes because it is at this grass roots level that health professionals can work together to resolve the major sticking points – accurately assessing risk, identifying when it changes and responding appropriately. While a lack of political will is a major obstacle to reform it is amenable to change. We argue that system-wide reform is most likely to occur when policy-makers can reference examples of successful locally-based midwifery-led programs across Australia.

Highlights

  • For nearly two decades calls have been made to expand the role of midwives within maternity services in Australia

  • Summary: In order to expand access to midwifery care, advocates should abandon the idea of system-wide reform for

  • We argue that system-wide reform is most likely to occur when policy-makers can reference examples of successful locally-based midwifery-led programs across Australia

Read more

Summary

Discussion

How useful is the evidence? A case study on the safety of birth centres Despite the evidence in favour of expanding access to midwifery-led care, critics continue to argue that it is not safe. Midwifery advocates' best hope for eventual system-wide changes to maternity care is to focus in the short term on local level reforms This will allow them to include critics and sceptics in trials of midwifery care, thereby ensuring their concerns about safety are addressed and that new models are developed that are safe, effective and provide women with the choice they want. The Mareeba model has been commended because it addresses the major priorities for change outlined in the Rebirthing report [6]namely "poor outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander babies, care for women in rural and remote areas; and the dearth of post-birth care" [30] and serves as a clear example of the power of community-level advocates to overcome inadequacies in statebased services Another example of a local trial of midwifery-led care has been operating in rural Victoria. Advocates wishing to improve access to midwifery-led care need to resist the temptation to campaign for reform at a system-wide level and focus their attention instead on implementing change slowly, and at the local level

Summary
Senate Community Affairs References Committee
The Maternity Coalition
17. Maternity Coalition
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.