Abstract

Copeter is one of the few Tempus/Tacis projects about consortium building: bringing libraries together in a consortium in order to achieve common goals. This article will attempt to answer three main questions: 1. What factors create good library co-operation? 2. What are the conditions for success? 3. Is the Copeter consortium fulfilling these requirements?

Highlights

  • Copeter is one of the few Tempus/Tacis projects about consortium building: bringing libraries together in a consortium in order to achieve common goals

  • Many countries have tried to create union catalogues. This was and is the case in Russia. This is the case in the Netherlands and Belgium, both partners in the Copeter project

  • Cost-effectiveness as a justification of the means: Russian libraries have learned in the past difficult years to handle costs with great care

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Copeter is one of the few Tempus/Tacis projects about consortium building: bringing libraries together in a consortium in order to achieve common goals. Belgium started a defensive co-operative acquisition scheme in the 1980s for periodicals, right at the beginning of the periodicals crisis It was not successful, since the university clientele did not allow continuing less important journals to the detriment of the core journals, because the first ones had been put on the list of non-cancellable titles - a non-sustainable model of library co-operation!. This is the case in the Netherlands and Belgium, both partners in the Copeter project New technologies such as Z39.50 and the OAI protocol for metadata harvesting (OAI PMH) can make the older production methods of union catalogues quickly become obsolete. Is the Copeter consortium fulfilling the requirements laid out by Maurice Line and Professor Häkli in order to become a sustainable and successful project?

Clearly defined purpose
Other means for achieving the same goal
Cost-effectiveness as a justification of the means
Production of better results
Global context
Avoiding of over-planning and top-down planning
Common goals
Organisational structure
Findings
An efficient agency
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.