Abstract
Landscape is increasingly conceptualized as a resource. We argue that although a resource-based approach may be positive in terms of conservation outcomes, focusing on use value does not do sufficient justice to the many complex facets of landscape. Reiterating the Florence Declaration on Landscape, which considers that “landscape is a common good”, we suggest that the conceptualization of landscape as a commons will resolve the discrepancy. However, a conceptual shift towards a more holistic commons-based approach requires a detailed understanding of the different values of landscape. Based on a phenomenological conceptualization of the landscape, this article explores the theoretical roots of the definition of the different values of landscape. It distinguishes between use, existence (e.g. aesthetic) and intrinsic values. This exercise is not an end in itself, but is intended to establish a theoretical framework promoting a dialogue between these values and show how they complement each other. A precise understanding of the different landscape values contributes not only to the conceptualization of landscape as a commons, but also to a better understanding of real-life landscape conflicts. Drawing on the empirical example of the Lavaux UNESCO World Heritage Site in Switzerland, the article demonstrates that, in practice, landscape conservation projects that avoid deadlock succeed in striking a balance between the three conceptions of landscape value.
Highlights
Landscape is increasingly conceptualized as a resource.1 This approach gained international recognition when it was adopted by the European Landscape Convention (Council of Europe 2000), which asserts that landscape “constitutes a resource favourable to economic activity and whose protection, management and planning can contribute to job creation”
We argue that a resource-based approach may be positive in terms of conservation outcomes, focusing on use value does not do sufficient justice to the many complex facets of landscape
We argue that the resourcebased approach may be positive in terms of conservation outcomes, focusing on use value does not do sufficient justice to the many complex facets of landscape and – more pragmatically – to the resolution of landscape conflicts
Summary
Landscape is increasingly conceptualized as a resource. This approach gained international recognition when it was adopted by the European Landscape Convention (Council of Europe 2000), which asserts that landscape “constitutes a resource favourable to economic activity and whose protection, management and planning can contribute to job creation”. In view of the growing importance of the resource-based approach to evaluating landscapes and the conceptual difficulties that often arise when non-use values are associated with a resource-based appraisal, this article aims to go back to the theoretical roots of the definition of the different values of landscape. This exercise is not an end in itself, but is intended to establish a theoretical framework that promotes a dialogue between these values and shows how they complement each other. We conclude with a discussion on the merit of appraising landscapes as commons rather than resources (Section 6)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
