Abstract

This special section is devoted to the topic of knowledge in policy making. Knowledge – data, arguments, scientific findings, ideas about policy instruments and their effects, even values and ideologies – guides judgements of decision makers about what to do or not to do. Expert or scientific knowledge and policy advice still dominate in policy analysis debates (particularly in the evidence-based policy making movement), although in recent years the role of other types of “usable” knowledge such as lay knowledge or tacit knowledge is acquiring increased recognition. In addition, processes of social learning and the building of advocacy coalitions around specific forms of knowledge are capturing scholars’ attention. As can be seen, the (often conflicted and contested) role of knowledge in public policy can be understood from a range of theoretical and empirical perspectives – and this richness of perspectives, as well as conflicts around specific forms of knowledge, became the starting point for our call for papers, published in February 2014. From the number of contributions that we received, three are being published in this special section, accompanied by a literature review written by us, the Guest Editors.

Highlights

  • This special section is devoted to the topic of knowledge in policy making

  • From the number of contributions that we received, three are being published in this special section, accompanied by a literature review written by us, the Guest Editors

  • The first paper of this special section serves as a literature review framing various scholarly approaches towards studying the relationships between knowledge and policy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This special section is devoted to the topic of knowledge in policy making. Knowledge – data, arguments, scientific findings, ideas about policy instruments and their effects, even values and ideologies – guides judgements of decision makers about what to do or not to do. The critique of technocratic and managerial understandings of knowledge and its utilisation that privilege particular forms of knowledge (produced with particular ontologies and methodologies and expressed and disseminated in particular ways) as well as knowledge producers and other types of knowledge workers (specific disciplines, think tanks or consultants) comes from various directions, even eroding the problem-solving narrative of public policy.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.