From interface to interphase

Abstract

A critical brief review of the evolution of the ideas describing the matter, with emphasis on concepts relevant to the journal's goals: surfaces, interfaces, and interphases is presented. The complex relationship between interphase and interface, including the role of the submicron confinement on the physical and chemical properties of matter are analyzed from both theoretical and experimental standpoints. The most important consequences triggered by the recognition of interphases are briefly discussed. Most matter (at a macroscopic scale) is dominated by bulk behavior. The rapid advances in materials and especially the accelerated progress in the synthesis and characterization of submicron materials and associated technologies, labeled as the “nano revolution”, revived the research on interfaces and interphases at atomic and molecular scales. It is suggested that interphase ignites a new kind of material, whose “bulk physical features” have been distorted by the submicron confinement. Such an “interphase surface” (for example a drop of gold with a diameter smaller than a few nanometers, or a few layers of graphene), may exist free standing and be stable. These materials, which no more exhibit the bulk properties will be tentatively referred to as “Sutter” (“Sutter” defines an abbreviation that involves both surface and matter concepts). Sutter is characterized by the fact that its physical and chemical properties are controlled by the interphase. It is concluded that Sutter is essentially a submicron phase of the matter, that exhibits size-dependent features. Sutter materials may be embedded in various materials (such as polymers, metals, and alloys) as nanocomposites, thus projecting specific features at the macroscopic scale. Most free standing interphases may be considered as Sutter materials or phases. The interface does not qualify as a Sutter material.