Abstract

We investigated how information from face features is combined by comparing sensitivity to individual features with that for external (head shape, hairline) and internal (nose, mouth, eyes, eyebrows) feature compounds. Discrimination thresholds were measured for synthetic faces under the following conditions: (a) full-faces; (b) individual features (e.g., nose); and (c) feature compounds (either external or internal). Individual features and feature compounds were presented both in isolation and embedded within a fixed, task irrelevant face context. Relative to the full-face baseline, threshold elevations for the internal feature compound (2.41x) were comparable to those for the most sensitive individual feature (nose = 2.12x). External features demonstrated the same pattern. A model that incorporated all available feature information within a single channel in an efficient way overestimated sensitivity to feature compounds. Embedding individual features within a task-irrelevant context reduced discrimination sensitivity, relative to isolated presentation. Sensitivity to feature compounds, however, was unaffected by embedding. A loss of sensitivity when embedding features within a fixed-face context is consistent with holistic processing, which limits access to information about individual features. However, holistic combination of information across face features is not efficient: Sensitivity to feature compounds is no better than sensitivity to the best individual feature. No effect of embedding internal feature compounds within task-irrelevant external face features (or vice versa) suggests that external and internal features are processed independently.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIn an attempt to break down the vast amount of information, faces may be conceptualized as a combination of individual features (e.g., head shape, hairline, nose, mouth, eyes, and eyebrows; Figure 1a)

  • Faces are complex, multidimensional stimuli that provide a wealth of information

  • Face discrimination thresholds were averaged across face identity and average data are considered in all subsequent analyses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In an attempt to break down the vast amount of information, faces may be conceptualized as a combination of individual features (e.g., head shape, hairline, nose, mouth, eyes, and eyebrows; Figure 1a). These components are often broadly categorized as either external features (head shape and hairline) or internal features (nose, mouth, eyes, and eyebrows; middle tier of Figure 1b), a categorization that has received empirical support (Axelrod & Yovel, 2010; Betts & Wilson, 2010; Logan, Gordon, & Loffler, 2017; Nichols, Betts, & Wilson, 2010).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.