From geochemical background determination to pollution assessment of heavy metals in sediments and soils

Abstract

Establishing geochemical background concentrations to distinguish the natural background from anthropogenic concentrations of heavy metals in sediments and soils is necessary to develop guidelines for environmental legislation. Due to the fact that the background concentrations strongly depend on geological characteristics such as mineral composition, grain size distribution and organic matter content, several normalization methods have been developed. Empirical (geochemical), theoretical (statistical) and integrated methods (combining both empirical and theoretical methods) are the main approaches described in literature for determination of geochemical background concentrations. In this review paper, the different approaches as well as the main normalization methods for heavy metal concentrations in sediments and soils will be discussed. Both geochemical background concentrations and added risk level (maximum permissible addition) should be taken into account for setting up legal threshold limits. Moreover, different approaches to evaluate the pollution status of heavy metals in sediments and soils, from Sediment/Soil Quality Guidelines to quantitative indices (Geo-accumulation Index-Igeo, Enrichment Factor-EF, Pollution Load Index-PLI and Risk assessment Code-RAC) will be presented. Although guidelines to establish whether a sediment or soil is polluted or not are generally only related to total metal concentrations, the available/reactive pool i.e., availability/reactivity of metals should be taken into account for sediment/soil pollution assessment.