Abstract
The article considers challenges for man, society and nature, which appeared under the new types of rationality and bring not only the desired achievements but also unintended consequences in the form of side-effects, ambivalences, and vulnerabilities that become more complex. Thus, formal rationality became a factor of transition from traditional societies to industrial ones, which facilitated the establishment of high standards of living, but at the same time had side-effects such as the iron cage of bureaucratization that made social relationships impersonal and without binding values. The growing formal rationality produced more complex side-effects such as legitimation crisis, colonization of the essential functions of peoples life-worlds, and dependence on legal and administrative bureaucracies. Formal rationality led to ambivalences: rationalization helped people to adapt to the dynamics of social life but also had irrational consequences - achievements in scientific knowledge and technologies advanced beyond moral limits. Formal rationality gave birth to society of normalization and biopower which generated the system of total control in the form of the Panapticon spreading its influence throughout the whole society. McDonaldization as a form of modern formal rationality worsened the situation by producing globally dehumanized nothings. Digital rationality creates objective conditions for complex vulnerabilities to society and nature in the form of normal accidents and collateral damage. The author argues that digital rationality acquires two basic types that are culturally determined: pragmatic type - hybrid rationality rooted in the principles of practical, formal, instrumental rationality and McDonaldization; substantive digital type with an emphasis on human needs and ontological safety. To minimize the vulnerabilities of the pragmatic digital rationality and to avoid the digital iron cage, the author suggests: rejection of radicalism and pragmatism in relation to digital technologies and artificial intelligence; humanistic modernization; eco-digital policy; interdisciplinary research of complex nonlinear vulnerabilities.
Highlights
The article considers challenges for man, society and nature, which appeared under the new types of rationality and bring the desired achievements and unintended consequences in the form of side-effects, ambivalences, and vulnerabilities that become more complex
He believed that formal rationality had both clear undoubted advantages and latent hidden dangers in the form of ‘irrational elements’, and under certain circumstances could transform into irrationality leading to disenchantment and the ‘iron cage’ of bureaucracy
Digital rationality includes the following basic components: artificial intelligence functioning as a kind of ‘non-human actant’ [18], so that social actors acquire new statuses, perform social roles online, and adapt to the global complexity and nonlinear reality; transmission mechanism to manage increasingly complex ambivalences and vulnerabilities; digital communications integrating all forms of media and used for interaction between human actors and non-human actants; means to reenchant the world — to minimize effects of excesses, especially simulations, in the contemporary life
Summary
The article considers challenges for man, society and nature, which appeared under the new types of rationality and bring the desired achievements and unintended consequences in the form of side-effects, ambivalences, and vulnerabilities that become more complex. According to Mannheim, rationalization becomes more complex, which produced ambivalences: on the one hand, rationalization helps people to better and more adapt to the dynamics of social life; on the other hand, there are irrational consequences due to the effect of ‘contemporaneity of the non-contemporaneous, and unbalanced development of different areas of life of both individuals and social groups.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.