FROM FLATLAND TO FRACTALAND: NEW GEOMETRIES IN RELATIONSHIP TO ARTISTIC AND SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS

Abstract

Abbott’s 19th century book, Flatland, continues to be popularly interpreted as both a social commentary and a way of visualizing the 4th-dimension by analogy. I attempt here to integrate these two seemingly disparate readings. Flatland is better interpreted as a story with a central theme that social, perceptual, and conceptual innovations are linked to changes in geometry. In such cases as the shift from the two-dimensional world of Flatland to a three-dimensional Spaceland, the taxonomic restructuring of human importance from Linnaeaus to Darwin, or the part/whole proportional shift from Ptolemy’s earth as the center of the universe to Copernicus’s sun, new geometries have changed our thinking, seeing, and social values, and lie at the heart of innovations in both art and science. For example, the two greatest innovations in art — the Renaissance with geometric perspective, and the birth of modern art at the beginning of this century with n-dimensional and non-Euclidean geometries — were developed by artists who were thinking within new geometries. When we view the history of scientific revolutions as new geometries, rather than only as new ideas, we gain direct access to potential manipulations of the structures of human innovation itself. I will discuss the seven historical markers of scientific revolutions (suggested by Kuhn, Cohen, and Popper), and how these seven traits correlate and can now be seen within the new paradigm of fractals and nonlinear sciences.