Abstract

Despite the growing use of virtual environments for training in complex industrial settings, we have little understanding of how these innovative settings transform training and trainers everyday work. This study investigates the instructional use of an industrial building’s virtual environment by expert trainers during a training session for nuclear power plant field operators. Drawing from the course-of-action theoretical and methodological framework, field notes, continuous video-recording of the training sessions and verbalisations during post-training self-confrontation interviews with the trainers were collected and analysed. The results point out four typical instructional uses of the virtual environment in authentic settings: (a) showing the material elements and spatial layout of certain areas of the reactor building, (b) displaying safe and typical paths through the building, (c) explaining functional aspects to help trainees develop an operating model of the nuclear building, and (d) sharing salient experience through real-life anecdotes. These typical uses and their related learning dimensions are anchored in the re-enactments of expert trainer’s embodied past events. The discussion develops the counterintuitive idea that from an instructional point of view, the intensified immersion of trainers afforded by the virtual environment seems less influential than emerging practice-based learning experiences. We conclude with new possibilities for improving learning through and for work thanks to re-enactment of expert trainers’ past work practices.

Highlights

  • Longstanding research themes in vocational education and training (VET) have focused on how to bring school learning closer to real life situations and practices, how to facilitate the integration of conceptual knowledge and practical knowledge which is fundamental for the development of expertise (Tynjälä 1999; Tynjälä et al 2003), and how work-based experiences for students can be integrated with learning in vocational education programmes (Billett 2014; Billett et al 2013; Stenström and Tynjälä 2009)

  • Four typical uses of this virtual environment (VE) came to light in this first training session supported by this visualisation tool (Fig. 3): (a) showing the material elements and spatial layout of certain areas of the reactor building, (b) displaying safe and typical paths through the building, (c) explaining functional aspects and help trainees appropriate an operating model of the reactor building, and (d) sharing salient experience through real-life anecdotes

  • The analysis identified four typical uses of the VE during the observed training session: (a) showing the material elements and spatial layout of certain areas of the reactor building, (b) displaying safe and typical paths through the building, (c) explaining functional aspects and help trainees appropriate an operating model of the reactor building, and (d) sharing salient experience through real-life anecdotes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Longstanding research themes in vocational education and training (VET) have focused on how to bring school learning closer to real life situations and practices, how to facilitate the integration of conceptual knowledge and practical knowledge which is fundamental for the development of expertise (Tynjälä 1999; Tynjälä et al 2003), and how work-based experiences for students can be integrated with learning in vocational education programmes (Billett 2014; Billett et al 2013; Stenström and Tynjälä 2009). Educational technologies must be used accurately and incorporated into educational ecosystems (Dillenbourg 2008), which means being integrated within adequate activities that educators (at school or at work) orchestrate (e.g., Schwendimann et al 2015). This is strengthened by the fact that many of the technologies available for educative purposes have not been designed for learning and teaching, and the educator needs to understand the affordances and constraints of such technologies to creatively repurpose them for the educational context (Mishra and Koehler 2006)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.