Abstract
The concept of response generalization is addressed, as it was discussed in a symposium at the 2001 meeting of the International Association for Behavior Analysis and presented in three articles in this journal issue. Relationships between behavioral ecology, social validity, and response generalization are examined from the perspective of behavioral community psychology, especially research conducted by the author and colleagues to increase safe driving practices. The challenge of moving beyond evaluating intervention side effects to planning for a beneficial spread of effect is entertained, including theory to predict whether treatment generality will be desirable or undesirable. The issue of whether intervention side effects should be termed “response generalization” is covered by pinpointing critical distinctions made in the preceding articles, one claiming the spread of effect discussed here is response generalization and the other two articles proclaiming it is not. These latter two presentations reject the response generalization label for very different and contradictory reasons.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.