Abstract
The social turn of cognitive linguistics and cognitive turn of critical discourse analysis breed the opportunity for cognitive linguistics and critical discourse analysis to develop towards a more converging path that integrates both cognitive and social dimensions of language. As known, political discourse is intrinsically persuasive and always informs a power relation with attempts to achieve effectiveness of persuasion. This paper argues that both approaches (Cognitive Linguistics and CDA) are concerned with surfaced evidence of implicit ideologies hidden behind political discourse, so the integration of CL and CDA could extend the research scope for both paradigms on one hand, and provide more powerful explanatory tools to augment our understanding of the intertwined relations between language, cognition and society on the other.
Highlights
Both Cognitive Linguistics ( CL) and Critical Discourse Analysis ( CDA) have developed into quite influential research paradigms since 1970s
CL centers on studies that uncover how language functions as a cognitive ability through conceptual metaphor, constructing mental space and online conceptual blending whereas CDA analysts primarily revolve around how language represents ideological discursive practice through texts produced in social context
It is hard to conceive of a type of political discourse which is free from any form of ideological imposition
Summary
Both Cognitive Linguistics ( CL) and Critical Discourse Analysis ( CDA) have developed into quite influential research paradigms since 1970s. CL centers on studies that uncover how language functions as a cognitive ability through conceptual metaphor, constructing mental space and online conceptual blending whereas CDA analysts primarily revolve around how language represents ideological discursive practice through texts produced in social context.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have