Abstract

This article touches upon the problematic reception of the female pioneers of the historical avant-gardes - by contemporaries and art historians - more specifically within the movements of Futurism, Dadaism and Surrealism. What artistic strategies did avant-garde women apply to resist the omnipresent misogyny that was not only trivializing female creation but also sexualizing the female ‘other’? How is the gender binary embedded and challenged within their artistic practice?   This article observes firstly, how a critical engagement with the rather masculine format of the manifesto empowered women in dealing with the stereotypical imagery of womanhood at the time. Second, the application of so-called “inferior” media (embroidery, design, dance) and materials (textile, wood, the body) tackled the patriarchal classification of the arts and the subordinate role of women in it. Finally, the live performance of genderplay allowed female artists to articulate the bankruptcy of traditional gender conventions responsible for the problematic reception of many female artists through art history.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.