Abstract

This article proposes an alternative tourism development approach that we have termed ‘rebalancing’, which is based on tourism development adopting Community-based Tourism (CBT) principles and characteristics whose hallmark is to give local control of the tourism sector to disadvantaged members of society. The article is based on extant literature and uses Hanoi as a case study to articulate the role of CBT against a backdrop of the growth and presence of large international hotel chains in Hanoi following the adoption of the Doi Moi policy. The increase in international hotel chains poses a high risk of an increase in leakages. The accommodation sub-sector and food sector are essential in tourism in Hanoi, as they are elsewhere. These provide small businesses the opportunity to participate in the name of inclusivity, empowerment, and poverty alleviation. For the authenticity of Hanoi and respecting its traditions and values, we propose a model of growth for Hanoi that includes food street vendors alongside large international hotel chains, large national (privately owned) hotels (nationally/locally owned), small independent national hotels (locally owned), bed and breakfast/guesthouse (locally owned), backpackers (locally owned), homestay (locally owned), ‘Albergo Diffuso’ (locally owned), LCBT accommodation (locally owned), CBT (Independently owned structures under an umbrella organization), and CBT (community-owned structures). It also suggests the retention of traditional architecture for the diversity and uniqueness of Hanoi. It recommends that the government should not promulgate legislation and policies that attempt to limit the scope of food street vending but rather empower food street vendors to grow and prosper. This should be done alongside specific legislation that sets minimum standards related to hygiene on the streets for inclusive growth and poverty alleviation.

Highlights

  • In recent decades, the tourism sector has continued to grow to become a key development driver in countries worldwide (Rifai 2013)

  • Tourism is understood as a strategy for the expansion and survival of capitalism (Bianchi 2009, 2010), where mass tourism ignores adopting more distributive measures (Saayman and Giampiccoli 2016), making it difficult for disadvantaged communities to participate in the tourism sector (Schilcher 2007)

  • Compared to pro-poor tourism (PPT), Community-based Tourism (CBT) has been touted as a better alternative tourism approach for community development that heralds a shift towards localizing tourism’s control and benefits (Saayman and Giampiccoli 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The tourism sector has continued to grow to become a key development driver in countries worldwide (Rifai 2013). The negative impacts of tourism can include, among other thing, economic leakage, increased living costs, imitation of consumption patterns, and crowding out of local businesses—principally in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (Comerio and Strozzi 2019; Weidenfeld 2018) This last issue is relevant because, for job creation and economic growth, micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) are essential in tourism for inclusiveness (San Andres et al 2016). The UNWTO, in its document about mitigation of the social and economic impacts of COVID-19, states: This crisis may offer a unique opportunity to shape the sector to ensure it grows, but it grows better, with inclusivity, sustainability and responsibility prioritized. CBT “is a complex and emerging field of study, and much remains to be learned” (Naik 2014, p. 46)

Materials and Methods
Literature Review
Community-Based Tourism
Accommodation and Community-Based Tourism
Hanoi Food Street Vendors and Architecture
Ancient
Representation of the proposed
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call