Abstract

Physicians are known for safeguarding their professional identities against organisational influences. However, this study shows how a medical leadership programme enables the reconstruction of professional identities that work with rather than against organisational and institutional contexts to improve quality and efficiency of care. Based on an ethnographic study, the results illustrate how physicians initially construct conflicting leadership narratives – heroic (pioneer), clinical (patient's guardian) and collaborative (linking pin) leader – in reaction to changing organisational and clinical demands. Each narrative contains a particular relational‐agentic view of physicians regarding the contexts of hospitals: respectively as individually shapeable; disconnected or collectively adjustable. Interactions between teachers, participants, group discussions and in‐hospital experiences led to the gradual deconstruction of the heroic –and clinical leader narrative. Collaborative leadership emerged as the desirable new professional identity. We contribute to the professional identity literature by illustrating how physicians make a gradual transition from viewing organisational and institutional contexts as pre‐given to contexting, that is, continuously adjusting the context with others. When engaged in contexting, physicians increasingly consider managers and directors as necessary partners and colleague‐physicians who do not wish to change as the new ‘anti‐identity’.

Highlights

  • Physicians are well-known for safeguarding their professional and elite identity upon ‘external threats’, such as the increase in managerialism and market logics in health care (Numerato et al 2012)

  • The results show how physicians performed identity work in a medical leadership development programme by constructing different leadership narratives of the self: that is, the heroic, clinical or collaborative leader

  • Each leadership narrative contains a particular relational-agentic view of physicians regarding the context of hospitals: respectively as shapeable by an individual heroic leader; as disconnected from the clinical leader or as collectively adjustable by collaborative leadership

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Physicians are well-known for safeguarding their professional and elite identity upon ‘external threats’, such as the increase in managerialism and market logics in health care (Numerato et al 2012). By framing physicians as leaders, opinion-makers stimulate other physicians to disrupt ‘old’ professional values, such as professional autonomy, hierarchy and socialization, in order to construct a new medical identity, which enables physicians to meet societal and clinical challenges (Berghout et al 2018) In this light, various initiatives to develop medical leadership have emerged. Educational institutes have been established by medical associations offering physicians the possibility to train themselves as ‘leaders’ in medical leadership development programmes (MLDP) (Frich et al 2015) These initiatives stimulate physicians to act as ‘leaders’ in their daily work by setting up multidisciplinary collaboration, taking care of cost-efficiency and fulfilling roles in hospital governance

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call