Abstract

Despite claims of continuity, contemporary data journalism is quite different from the earlier tradition of computer-assisted reporting. Although it echoes earlier claims about being scientific and democratic, these qualities are understood as resulting from better data access rather than as being something achieved by the journalist. In the context of Big Data in particular, human subjectivity tends to be downgraded in importance, even understood as getting in the way if it means hubristically theorising about causation rather than working with correlation and allowing the data to speak. Increasing ‘datafication’ is not what is driving changes in the profession, however. Rather, the impact of Big Data tends to be understood in ways that are consonant with pre-existing expectations, which are shaped by the broader contemporary post-humanist political context. The same is true in academic analysis, where actor–network theory seems to be emerging as the dominant paradigm for understanding data journalism, but in largely uncritical ways.

Highlights

  • Despite claims of continuity, contemporary data journalism is quite different from the earlier tradition of computer-assisted reporting

  • It is true that how we do journalism has changed, the more important change is in how we think about journalism, and that change is not driven by new technologies but needs to be understood in broader contextual terms

  • Rather than digital data technologies causing changes in journalism, it is more that both Big Data and journalism are increasingly understood in ways that are consonant with broader shifts in how we think about the human subject and his/her ability to know about and act on the world as object

Read more

Summary

Philip Hammond London South Bank University

There is no shortage of terms describing something new going on in contemporary journalism. Rather than digital data technologies causing changes in journalism, it is more that both Big Data and (data) journalism are increasingly understood in ways that are consonant with broader shifts in how we think about the human subject and his/her ability to know about and act on the world as object. These broader changes are evident in what seems to be an emerging consensus in the scholarly engagement with data journalism which, rather than offering a critique, finds confirmation of its own posthumanist assumptions

Continuity and change
Findings
Uncritical approaches
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.