Abstract

The nursing profession in the UK, is today faced with major changes in the light of the Post Registration and Practice Project (PREPP) (UKCC 1990). This paper raises questions about how the maintenance of professional competence as detailed in PREPP can be assured. Through a discussion of professional portfolios and continuing education, the subjectivity of guaranteeing a practitioner's competence at tri-annual re-registration is raised. With reference to Benner's (1984) work, the paper suggests that there may be some similarities on the ‘novice to expert’ continuum that relate directly to the UKCC's proposals. However, the inherent deficiencies with such a mandatory approach to professional development are discussed and questions posed about the extent of nurses' continuing education needs being met. In view of the controversy that still surrounds who will finance the changes, and what format the portfolios will adopt, practitioners are at risk of conforming to the changes but being denied the opportunity of ensuring that they possess the necessary skills and frameworks, that are essential in ensuring the maintenance of clinical competence. The paper suggests that a concerted effort will be required by both educators and service personnel to ensure that the PREPP proposals are successful.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call