Abstract

The chaîne opératoire (CO) approach is a well-established method for the analysis of tool creation, use and discard, and associated cognitive processes. Its effectiveness in respect of cognition, however, is occasionally challenged. We briefly review key critiques of its epistemological and methodological limitations and consider alternative options. We suggest a new epistemological position and methodology which can link CO with alternative cognitive models and with the true complexity inherent in the stone tool archaeological record. Perception-action and embodied cognition theory are the proposed foundations of a new epistemology that allows us to reject the concept of thought processes underlying tool-making sequences as static entities selected from memory. Instead, they are described as arising, changing and flowing with and through bodily activity, or as the products of constant interaction between body, mind and environment. They are better understood as ongoing processes of situated task-structuring rather than as objectified concepts or symbols. The new methodology is designed to analyse individual tool-making processes rather than their products. We use a pilot study to explore how it can highlight variations in the gestural processes that structure different technologies and thus indicate potential differences in the associated cognitive strategies of the various tool-makers concerned.

Highlights

  • This article aims to identify a reliable theoretical framework and methodology that allow an analysis of differences between cognitive strategies underlying a range of different prehistoric technology types

  • Each group was assessed in terms of whether or not it was sensitive enough to show changes between every task type, or whether it could only be used to show change between reductive and combinatorial technologies

  • Postural variables These were highly predictable for the Reductive Tool Maker (RTM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article aims to identify a reliable theoretical framework and methodology that allow an analysis of differences between cognitive strategies underlying a range of different prehistoric technology types. A subsidiary aim is to establish a methodology that can detect gradual as well as discontinuous or stepwise cognitive change over evolutionary time. The desired theoretical framework should describe a set of competencies which vary across individual agents and are capable of change in response to environmental factors. These competencies should be able to contribute to increased fitness and be heritable via one or more routes (Jablonka & Lamb 2014). The methodology should be able to detect motor differences between tool-making sequences and be sensitive to potential variations between tasks that might reflect differences between the cognitive strategies of individual tool-makers. The combined approach must be applicable to stone-tool technology which provides the most durable evidence of technological and cognitive evolution, but should be relevant to organic material technologies (Barham 2013a)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call