Abstract

As in many other UK institutions, the implementation of Personal Development Planning (PDP) has been varied across the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan). This is due to a number of factors, including a limited understanding by staff of the underlying principles of reflection and their own personal development as practitioners. In the past, workshops with staff on PDP were often met with resistance and poor attendance. As an alternative, we have sought student perceptions of PDP, in the hope that these could be used to engage and influence members of staff. Year one students from ten different courses were given a session on PDP at the end of which they produced posters representing their perceptions of PDP for their course. The terms in these posters were coded and placed in appropriate categories then ranked to allow for comparisons between groups. Individual priorities for immediate action were captured on post-it notes. A year later the same students were surveyed once again and individual perceptions were captured by a questionnaire. Groups were shown their original poster and asked to create a new poster in the light of a year's experience.First years' posters had elements of theoretical frameworks for PDP, with about half showing an idea of progressive development over time; posters from second years were less theoretical and instead reflected real-life experiences, with fewer terms but more extensive wording, and less focus on stages of development and forward planning. Second year students also showed evidence of engaging in PDP at an individual level with many reporting achievements in aspects such as time management which they had mentioned in year one. We conclude that students are able to recognise their development needs, and their achievements, but that the planning element of PDP is less well recognised.

Highlights

  • As in many other UK institutions, the implementation of Personal Development Planning (PDP) has been varied across the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan)

  • If staff have problems engaging in reflective practices this reduces the perceived rewards of helping students engage in PDP (Stefani, 2005)

  • This work has shown that while student understanding of PDP in a strictly formal sense may be limited, there is clear evidence of a deepening of their engagement in various aspects of personal development as they progress from first to second year. The content of their posters showed a greater maturity in year two: the representations were less reliant on the PDP framework given to them and there was more evidence of activities, such as reflection and action planning, which contribute to the process of PDP rather than just the context

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As in many other UK institutions, the implementation of Personal Development Planning (PDP) has been varied across the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan). Year one students from ten different courses were given a session on PDP at the end of which they produced posters representing their perceptions of PDP for their course The terms in these posters were coded and placed in appropriate categories ranked to allow for comparisons between groups. A year later the same students were surveyed once again and individual perceptions were captured by a questionnaire Groups were shown their original poster and asked to create a new poster in the light of a year's experience. The fact that PDP could be perceived as the result of external influences is well described by Moir et al (2006, p.1): The danger with such prescriptive approaches is that PDP may come to be seen as an imposition rather than something integral to the higher education experience

Methods
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.