Abstract
Climate change is altering the conditions for tree recruitment, growth, and survival, and impacting forest community composition. Across southeast Alaska, USA, and British Columbia, Canada, Callitropsis nootkatensis (Alaska yellow‐cedar) is experiencing extensive climate change‐induced canopy mortality due to fine‐root death during soil freezing events following warmer winters and the loss of insulating snowpack. Here, we examine the effects of ongoing, climate‐driven canopy mortality on forest community composition and identify potential shifts in stand trajectories due to the loss of a single canopy species. We sampled canopy and regenerating forest communities across the extent of C. nootkatensis decline in southeast Alaska to quantify the effects of climate, community, and stand‐level drivers on C. nootkatensis canopy mortality and regeneration as well as postdecline regenerating community composition. Across the plot network, C. nootkatensis exhibited significantly higher mortality than co‐occurring conifers across all size classes and locations. Regenerating community composition was highly variable but closely related to the severity of C. nootkatensis mortality. Callitropsis nootkatensis canopy mortality was correlated with winter temperatures and precipitation as well as local soil drainage, with regenerating community composition and C. nootkatensis regeneration abundances best explained by available seed source. In areas of high C. nootkatensis mortality, C. nootkatensis regeneration was low and replaced by Tsuga. Our study suggests that climate‐induced forest mortality is driving alternate successional pathways in forests where C. nootkatensis was once a major component. These pathways are likely to lead to long‐term shifts in forest community composition and stand dynamics. Our analysis fills a critical knowledge gap on forest ecosystem response and rearrangement following the climate‐driven decline of a single species, providing new insight into stand dynamics in a changing climate. As tree species across the globe are increasingly stressed by climate change‐induced alteration of suitable habitat, identifying the autecological factors contributing to successful regeneration, or lack thereof, will provide key insight into forest resilience and persistence on the landscape.
Highlights
Climate change is altering the conditions for tree recruitment, growth, and survival, and range shifts are a widely anticipated con‐ sequence of novel temperature and precipitation regimes
Species’ responses to climate change‐induced mortality will vary widely based on species‐specific traits, sensitivity to climatic extremes, biotic stressors, and abiotic conditions of the es‐ tablishment environment, requiring autecological studies on fac‐ tors limiting versus promoting success
In C. nootkatensis forests, there is no increase in C. nootkatensis regeneration abundances to offset canopy mortality
Summary
Climate change is altering the conditions for tree recruitment, growth, and survival, and range shifts are a widely anticipated con‐ sequence of novel temperature and precipitation regimes. Despite extensive research on the drivers of decline (Barrett, Latta, Hennon, & Eskelson, 2012; Buma et al, 2017; Hennon et al, 2012; Hennon, Hansen, & Shaw, 1990; Hennon & Shaw, 1997; Hennon, Shaw, & Hansen, 1990; Schaberg et al, 2008), little is known about C. nootkatensis regeneration following canopy mortality, and the fate of C. nootkatensis and long‐term dynamics of affected forests remain unknown To address these knowledge gaps and isolate the conditions dif‐ ferentiating habitat suitable for mature tree survival versus those key to successful regeneration in a climate mortality‐affected sys‐ tem, we sampled declining C. nootkatensis forests over a five‐de‐ gree latitude range in the NPCTR of southeast Alaska to ask the following: (a) “Does climate‐induced mortality occur across all size classes of the affected species, and, does regeneration response correspond with the same climate conditions driving mor‐ tality?”, (b) “If response is differential, what climatic and community factors drive tree mortality versus postdecline composition of the regenerating community?”, and (c) “Is community composition stable or in the process of a decline‐induced shift?”. Obtaining information on life stage response to climate‐induced mortality, postdecline community composition, and stand dynamics in the NPCTR and beyond will be essential to scientifically based forest management and vital to sup‐ porting conservation efforts in the face of climate change
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
