Abstract

We recently introduced in [9] a boundary-to-bound dictionary between gravitational scattering data and observables for bound states of non-spinning bodies. In this paper, we elaborate further on this holographic map. We start by deriving the following — remarkably simple — formula relating the periastron advance to the scattering angle: Delta Phi left(J,mathcal{E}right)=upchi left(J,mathcal{E}right)+upchi left(-J,mathcal{E}right) , via analytic continuation in angular momentum and binding energy. Using explicit expressions from [9], we confirm its validity to all orders in the Post-Minkowskian (PM) expansion. Furthermore, we reconstruct the radial action for the bound state directly from the knowledge of the scattering angle. The radial action enables us to write compact expressions for dynamical invariants in terms of the deflection angle to all PM orders, which can also be written as a function of the PM-expanded amplitude. As an example, we reproduce our result in [9] for the periastron advance, and compute the radial and azimuthal frequencies and redshift variable to two-loops. Agreement is found in the overlap between PM and Post-Newtonian (PN) schemes. Last but not least, we initiate the study of our dictionary including spin. We demonstrate that the same relation between deflection angle and periastron advance applies for aligned-spin contributions, with J the (canonical) total angular momentum. Explicit checks are performed to display perfect agreement using state-of-the-art PN results in the literature. Using the map between test- and two-body dynamics, we also compute the periastron advance up to quadratic order in spin, to one-loop and to all orders in velocity. We conclude with a discussion on the generalized ‘impetus formula’ for spinning bodies and black holes as ‘elementary particles’. Our findings here and in [9] imply that the deflection angle already encodes vast amount of physical information for bound orbits, encouraging independent derivations using numerical and/or self-force methodologies.

Highlights

  • We demonstrate that the same relation between deflection angle and periastron advance applies for aligned-spin contributions, with J the total angular momentum

  • 1Nevertheless, we have argued in paper I that the impetus formula invites itself to interpret the coefficients of the scattering amplitude as carrying physical information in the form of asymptotic charges

  • In this paper we have developed further the boundary-to-bound dictionary introduced in paper I, relating scattering data to gravitational observables for bound states

Read more

Summary

Radial action

The scattering angle and periastron advance can be obtained by taking the derivative with respect to the angular momentum of the radial action Notice that, at this stage, we have not made any additional assumption about the motion, which is assumed to be conservative, other than the fact that the bodies are nonrotating. As we shall see, continuing the development of the dictionary put forward in paper I, the scattering angle can be directly connected to the periastron advance for bound states, via analytic continuation in energy and angular momentum. This can be achieved once the orbital elements are identified, as we did in paper I. In what follows we will denote as r± the roots associated to the radial variable for the scattering problem; and omit the tilde, e.g. r±, for the case of bound orbits [9]

Deflection angle
Periastron advance
Endpoints: hyperbola vs ellipse
Post-Minkowskian expansion
M 4μ4j4
The exact f2-theory
Reconstructing the radial action
One-loop resummation
Gravitational observables
Aligned-spins
Scattering angle to periastron advance
Post-Newtonian expansion
Periastron advance to one-loop
Findings
Conclusions
A Scattering angle to periastron advance to all PM orders
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call