Abstract

BackgroundSuccesses in biomedicine have transformed HIV from a debilitating and frequently fatal infection to a chronic, manageable condition.ObjectiveTo explore how the contemporary metanarrative of HIV as a chronic condition is understood by patients and how it varies depending on when they were diagnosed.DesignQualitative interviews with 52 people living with HIV who were diagnosed during different phases in the history of the epidemic.Setting and participantsParticipants were recruited from two HIV clinics in London to include four “HIV generations”: generation 1 were those who had been diagnosed pre‐1997 (pre‐ART), generation 2 from 1997 to 2005 (complex ART), generation 3 from 2006 to 2012 (simpler ART) and generation 4 diagnosed in the year before the study (2013‐2014).ResultsParticipants in all HIV generations took their medication as prescribed, attended clinic appointments and were well informed about their immunological biomarkers. While the pre‐treatment generation had been engaged in community endeavours such as activism, public education and use of support groups, those more recently diagnosed had little experience of collective activities and their HIV was essentially a private matter, separate from their social identity. These strategies worked for some; however, those experiencing clinical or social problems related to HIV or wider issues often relied exclusively on their HIV clinic for wider support.ConclusionThe loss of public conversation around HIV, the imperative for patients to take on greater individual responsibility for HIV management and the streamlining of HIV services alongside reductions in ancillary support services may expose some people to suboptimal health outcomes.

Highlights

  • Antiretroviral therapy (ART) development and the results from clinical trials have transformed the management of HIV and the organization of clinical services

  • We explore how the contemporary metanarrative of HIV as a normalized, chronic disease is understood and experienced by people living with HIV and ask whether it varies for people who were diagnosed at different points of the epidemic

  • We have identified a rupture in the way people in the pre-­ and post-­ART generations relate to their condition: people diagnosed pre-­ART described involvement and activism through political campaigns and support groups, while those in the following generation consciously rejected such activities that reminded them of their HIV-­positive identity, finding greater resilience through isolating themselves from such community processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) development and the results from clinical trials have transformed the management of HIV and the organization of clinical services It has become a showpiece for successful translational medicine. While the pre-­treatment generation had been engaged in community endeavours such as activism, public education and use of support groups, those more recently diagnosed had little experience of collective activities and their HIV was essentially a private matter, separate from their social identity. These strategies worked for some; those experiencing clinical or social problems related to HIV or wider issues often relied exclusively on their HIV clinic for wider support. Conclusion: The loss of public conversation around HIV, the imperative for patients to take on greater individual responsibility for HIV management and the streamlining of HIV services alongside reductions in ancillary support services may expose some people to suboptimal health outcomes

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.