FRII-02 THE MANAGEMENT OF GENITOURINARY TRAUMA IN WORLD WAR II

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyHistory of Urology: History Forum II1 Apr 2016FRII-02 THE MANAGEMENT OF GENITOURINARY TRAUMA IN WORLD WAR II Joseph Sterbis, Ronald Caras, John Musser, and Ryan Speir Joseph SterbisJoseph Sterbis More articles by this author , Ronald CarasRonald Caras More articles by this author , John MusserJohn Musser More articles by this author , and Ryan SpeirRyan Speir More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2923AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES During the course of World War II, the United States lost over 400,000 service members, with more than 600,000 wounded. Genitourinary injury accounted for approximately 0.5% of those wounded. Our intent is to review the injuries and treatment modalities from that time, allowing for contemporary comparison. METHODS Primary and secondary literature sources were reviewed from World War II and the post-war era. These sources were surveyed to determine the organ-specific incidences of injury, the nature of combat-related genitourinary trauma, and the surgical and medical therapies utilized in both forward and rear echelons. RESULTS Reports of organ-specific injury rates demonstrate varied incidences: Kidney: 25-40%, External Genitalia: 30-56%, Bladder: 12-15%, Ureter: 1-3%. Reports following the war that discuss treatment modalities focus on immediate control of hemorrhage, urinary drainage, and infection control. Preoperative imaging of the kidney was considered of great importance when feasible, with authors recommending a one-shot intravenous pyelogram as a minimum. Conservative management of blunt renal trauma was advocated. Renorraphy was performed when feasible in penetrating trauma. Vascular repair was also considered, though no reported cases were identified. Upper ureteral injuries were managed with early repair over a catheter, while lower injuries were reimplanted. The Davis intubated ureterotomy, first reported in 1946, was advocated as a means for management of post-traumatic stricture. Extraperitoneal bladder injuries were managed conservatively or with repair if surgery for other injuries was planned. Intraperitoneal bladder injuries were managed with repair and suprapubic cystostomy. Posterior urethral injuries were managed via suprapubic diversion and early surgical approximation, the nature of which was ill-defined. Neurogenic bladder from spinal cord injury was generally managed with suprapubic cystostomy, with authors very clear that such injuries were not to be managed with intermittent catheterization. CONCLUSIONS With this year marking the 71st anniversary of the conclusion of World War II, review of historic data provides perspective informing our contemporary combat trauma management. With the notable exception of neurogenic bladder, many management principles have been preserved over time. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e521 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Joseph Sterbis More articles by this author Ronald Caras More articles by this author John Musser More articles by this author Ryan Speir More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...