Abstract
What ‘nature’ is being commodified in carbon markets, and why does it matter? How are carbon commodities and ecologies of repair co-produced through carbon forestry? Are the Polanyian notions of ‘fictitious commodification’ and ‘embeddedness’ appropriate for thinking about carbon forestry and voluntary carbon market (VCM) offsets? This article addresses these questions and extends the critical understanding of conservation in the ‘repair mode’ through an analysis that delves deeply into the black box of value production in the VCM. Focusing on the interplay of ‘virtuality’ and ‘virtue’ in the production of one variety of so-called ‘boutique’ blue forest carbon offset, this analysis demonstrates the technical abstractions needed isolate ‘carbon’ and force it into the commodity form create slippages between concrete socio-natures and geographies of offsetting and the imagined natures and geographies of a market environmentalist model of the world. This politics facilitates a dual pathway of accumulation via the material extraction of nature to feed the expansion of industrial growth (the subject of Polanyi’s critique) and, in parallel, through feeding new growth markets for nature-based commodities such as the VCM. These markets promise to repair the damage caused by industrial growth, but can only ‘work’ in the abstract, virtual realm despite entanglement with underlying concrete ecologies of repair. Based on this analysis, this article argues that the widespread view of carbon offsets as ‘embedded’ Polanyian fictitious commodities is incomplete, based on an ontological fallacy that conflates the ways in which concrete and abstracted, virtual ‘natures’ are used to produce value in the contemporary restoration economy. This fallacy implicitly reifies the central fictions and contradictions of carbon markets and the market environmentalist model more broadly. Considering VCM carbon forestry in terms of ‘scale-making’ and ‘world-making’ projects, the article presents an alternative conceptualisation of VCM carbon offsets as intangible ‘frictitious’ commodities that inhabit a complicated and only provisionally stabilised commodity form.
Highlights
In the preface to a 2009 report titled Blue carbon, Achim Steiner, the -UN UnderSecretary General and Executive Director of the UNEP, declared that: If we are to tackle climate change and make a transition to a resource efficient, Green Economy, we need to recognize the role and the contribution of all the colours of carbon
With particular attention to the slippages enabled by processes of abstraction, the analysis presented below extends these insights to revisit Castree’s (2003) question of ‘what nature is being commodified?’ by carbon forestry, clarifying distinctions between the extensive and intensive production of nature and market value in the repair mode
By opening up the black box of value production in the voluntary carbon market (VCM), we can see that carbon forestry is saturated with virtuality
Summary
In the preface to a 2009 report titled Blue carbon, Achim Steiner, the -UN UnderSecretary General and Executive Director of the UNEP, declared that: If we are to tackle climate change and make a transition to a resource efficient, Green Economy, we need to recognize the role and the contribution of all the colours of carbon. The publication of Blue carbon was an important moment in addressing a perceived ‘charisma’ gap regarding ‘often submerged, out of sight coastal habitats’ such as sea grass beds, salt marshes and mangrove forests (Duarte et al, 2008; Nelleman et al, 2009). It established coastal ecologies as a policy and value frontier, a vulnerable, neglected and threatened realm of global nature in urgent need of investment, management and repair (Nelleman et al, 2009: 35). It opened space for the production and marketing of a new variety of intangible environmental impact commodity in the form of ‘blue carbon’ offsets
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.