Abstract

Frequency distribution of azimuth and plunges of P- and T-axes of focal mechanisms is compared with the orientation of maximum compressive stress axis for investigating the frictional strength of three fault segments of North Anatolian fault (NAF) in eastern Marmara Sea, namely Princes’ Islands, Yalova–Cinarcik and Yalova–Hersek fault segments. In this frame, we retrieved 25 CMT solutions of events in Cinarcik basin and derived a local stress tensor incorporating 30 focal mechanisms determined by other researches. As for the Yalova–Cinarcik and Yalova–Hersek fault segments, we constructed the frequency distribution of P- and T-axes utilizing 111 and 68 events, respectively, to correlate the geometry of the principle stress axes and fault orientations. The analysis yields low frictional strength for the Princes’ Island fault segments and high frictional strength for Yalova–Cinarcik, Yalova–Hersek segments. The local stress tensor derived from the inversion of P- and T-axes of the fault plane solutions of Cinarcik basin events portrays nearly horizontal maximum compressive stress axis oriented N154E which is almost parallel to the peak of the frequency distribution of the azimuth of the P-axes. The fitting of the observed and calculated frequency distributions is attained for a low frictional coefficient which is about μ ≈ 0.1. Evidences on the weakness of NAF segments in eastern Marmara Sea region are revealed by other geophysical observations. Our results also show that the local stress field in Cinarcik basin is rotated ≈30° clockwise compared to the regional stress tensor in Marmara region derived from the large earthquakes, whereas the local stress tensor in Yalova–Cinarcik area is found to be rotated ≈30° counterclockwise. The rotation of the two local stress fields is derived in the area where NAF bifurcates into two branches overlaying large electrical conductor.

Highlights

  • The regional stress field along with the local stress perturbations provides invaluable information to understand the seismic hazard of a region under investigation and help to localize the sources of the tectonic driving forces (Stefanik and Jurdy 1992)

  • The fault segment of North Anatolian fault (NAF) in the Çınarcık basin named as Princes’ Island fault segment cuts the deep sediments of the basin from SE to NW direction where it connects with the main Marmara fault segment

  • The Princes’ Islands and the Yalova– Hersek segments are on-fault segments following the main trace of NAF zone in eastern Marmara Sea region, while the Yalova–Çınarcık segment is an off-fault segment (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The regional stress field along with the local stress perturbations provides invaluable information to understand the seismic hazard of a region under investigation and help to localize the sources of the tectonic driving forces (Stefanik and Jurdy 1992). In such studies, earthquake focal mechanisms and microtectonic field observations are widely used to retrieve the stress tensor parameters (Zoback 1993; Pinar et al 2003, 2010; Över et al 2013). The stress field acting in Marmara Sea region was the subject of several studies in the past resulting in a consensus with NW–SE trending maximum compressive principal stress axis (σ1) where strike-slip tectonic regime dominates (Gürbüz et al 2000; Kiratzi 2002; Pınar et al 2003, 2010; Örgülü 2011). The NW–SE extending branch is called Princes Islands fault segment, the WSE–ENE extending branch is called Yalova–Çınarcık segment, and the third segment is extending between Hersek and Yalova (Fig. 1b)

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call