Abstract

Covalent-functionalized graphene nanoplatelets (CF-GNPs) inside a circular heated-pipe and the subsequent pressure decrease loss within a fully developed turbulent flow were discussed in this research. Four samples of nanofluids were prepared and investigated in the ranges of 0.025 wt.%, 0.05 wt.%, 0.075 wt.%, and 0.1 wt.%. Different tools such as field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), ultraviolet-visible-spectrophotometer (UV-visible), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), zeta potential, and nanoparticle sizing were used for the data preparation. The thermophysical properties of the working fluids were experimentally determined using the testing conditions established via computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations that had been designed to solve governing equations involving distilled water (DW) and nanofluidic flows. The average error between the numerical solution and the Blasius formula was ~4.85%. Relative to the DW, the pressure dropped by 27.80% for 0.025 wt.%, 35.69% for 0.05 wt.%, 41.61% for 0.075 wt.%, and 47.04% for 0.1 wt.%. Meanwhile, the pumping power increased by 3.8% for 0.025 wt.%, 5.3% for 0.05 wt.%, 6.6% for 0.075%, and 7.8% for 0.1 wt.%. The research findings on the cost analysis demonstrated that the daily electric costs were USD 214, 350, 416, 482, and 558 for DW of 0.025 wt.%, 0.05 wt.%, 0.075 wt.%, and 0.1 wt.%, respectively.

Highlights

  • There is a maximum peak at the absorption range of

  • There is a maximum peak at the absorption range of ~260–270 nm nm for all of tested the tested samples

  • graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs); carbon (C), oxygen (O), silicon (Si), and sulfur (S), with the excellent quality of the tested samples and agree with the results found in the literature ments of the GNPs;corresponding carbon (C), oxygen silicon (Si),95.36%, and sulfur (S), withand the corresponding atomic(O), content being

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nanofluids improve heating rates, reduce processing time, and extend the life of machinery, making them ideal for use in power, manufacturing, transportation, medical, microfluidics, and microelectronics [1,2]. Heat transfer efficiency is poor in engineering applications involving fluids, when employing fluids such as engine oil Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3094. Nanofluids are fluids in which stable and homogeneous solid nanoparticles (metals, metal oxides, or carbon-based nanostructures) are suspended [4,5]. Nanoparticles (NPs) in the thermal boundary layer as well as their random movement within the fluid may have a positive impact on the convective heat transfer coefficient [6,7,8].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call