Friction and Texture Retention of Concrete Pavements

Abstract

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT), U.S., noticed a decline in skid trailer numbers on concrete pavements shortly after grinding operations. The engineers at the time suspected that the coarse aggregate caused the decline in these numbers and the resulting conclusion led to a ban of carbonate aggregates in mainline concrete pavement in Alabama that is still in place. This detailed laboratory study re-examines the fundamental friction issues that led to this policy. A total of 48 aggregate, grinding, and grooving combinations were tested as part of this study. Three aggregate sources were examined: a siliceous source, a “hard” limestone source, and a “soft” limestone source. Two blade spacings were examined for grinding operations: 52 blades/ft and 60 blades/ft. Some ground specimens were also grooved. Finally, a set of specimens had the Next Generation Concrete Surface (NGCS) applied to them. The specimens were polished with the National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) three-wheel polishing device (TWPD). The dynamic friction tester was used to evaluate friction values at various points through the polishing process. After the polishing, the macrotexture was characterized using the circular track meter. Across the board, the highest performing texture was that with no grooves and 52 blades/ft. Very generally, the loss of friction decreased with increasing siliceous content. However, some of the trends were extremely minor and, in a few cases, siliceous aggregates caused higher friction loss. There were numerous instances when blended carbonate/siliceous concrete pavement surfaces performed better than sole siliceous concrete pavement surfaces.