Abstract
ABSTRACT The aesthetic experience of an art work, and the analytic experience, are both created in a partnership; between artist and viewer, and analyst and patient. They take the viewer of an art work, and the analytic patient, beyond their familiar ways of relating to the world. The Moses of Michelangelo made a powerful impact on Freud, but he was unable to appreciate the aesthetic experience because he could not understand it rationally. Giving up the assumption that a work of art must represent something allows a different kind of engagement with it that is more contemplative and more psychoanalytic. Freud identified with Moses as a Jewish hero preserving the word-presentations of the Law against the irrational thing-presentation of the Golden Calf. A different response to the Moses appears in a film by Michelangelo Antonioni. Without words, it shows Antonioni gazing at the statue and interacting with it emotionally. Antonioni made the film aged 92. It is the last footage he shot, and its ending shows that, as well as the statue, he is gazing at his own death.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
