Abstract

Introduction: Data continue to accumulate showing older adults with hematologic malignancies, such as AML and MDS, derive a survival benefit from HCT. However, as HCT expands into older and less fit patients (pts), the inability to describe and predict post-HCT toxicity presents a major barrier to appropriate and broader application. Standard endpoints of non-relapse mortality (NRM), organ toxicity, graft-versus host disease (GvHD), or overall survival (OS) miss important common geriatric complications (e.g., delirium, disability, falls). We aimed to estimate disability-free survival (DiFS), a composite endpoint of death, dementia or physical disability, used in older adult non-oncology trials (McNeil J, N Engl J Med 2018; 379; 1499-1508) by summarizing disability in the early post-HCT context. Methods: We reviewed electronic records for the development of disability through day 100 for pts ≥ 60 years undergoing first HCT from 2013 - 2019 at City of Hope National Medical Center. Disability events included delirium affecting instrumental ADLs (i.e., CTC ≥ 2), falls, ICU admission, or needing mobility assistance. Mobility assistance leveraged a standardized nursing flowsheet tool completed every shift for hospitalized pts, comprised of 5 categories of ambulation independence (independent, assistive equipment, assistive person, assistive equipment and person, complete dependent); mobility timepoints captured were pre-HCT, weekly starting on day 0 to d21 and at hospital discharge. Categorization of assistive person or more after HCT met the mobility assistance requirement. All pts required hospitalization post-HCT in this era. Failure events for DiFS included first disability event as above or death. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate DiFS at d30 and d100. A conditional landmark analysis examined the differences in unadjusted NRM among pts experiencing disability prior to d30 or d100 landmark dates and alive at the landmark date. Results: Among 699 pts, 19.7% were ≥ 70 years, 77.0% had AML/MDS/MPN, 95.6% received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), 80.1% were conditioned with fludarabine/melphalan, and 86.7% received matched donors. Few pts needed mobility assistance pre-HCT (4.4%) although 28.3% developed mobility assistance by d21. The cumulative incidence of other disability events at d30 and d100 were: falls (4.9%, 14.3%), delirium (24.3%, 29.3%), and ICU admission (15.3%, 20.2%). NRM was 3.9% at d30 and 26.9% at 2 years. Figure 1 shows DiFS at d30 and d100 of 58.2% and 51.4%. The most common d30 disability events were delirium (41%) and mobility assistance (34.7%); all deaths by d30 (n=27) were preceded by a disability event. Baseline factors in univariate analysis associated with inferior d30 DiFS included KPS < 90% (p=.001), age ≥ 70 (.01), non-matched related donor (.003) but not HCT-CI ≥ 3, time period (<2018), conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis, or baseline mobility assistance. D30 disability events were strongly linked to elevated 2 yr NRM by d30 landmark analysis (figure 2)(40% vs 15% without d30 disability events, HR=2.77; 95% CI 2.11-3.64). Similarly, disability by d100 negatively influenced d100 to 2 year NRM (HR =2.27, 95% CI: 1.65-3.11). Conclusions: HCT among older adults engenders frequent geriatric complications of delirium, loss of ambulation independence, falls and ICU admission in the early HCT period. Consequently, DiFS is approximately 60% at day 30. Further, early disability strongly predicts for higher risk of future NRM. DiFS should be further explored as a novel endpoint to summarize functional loss after older adult HCT. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.