Abstract

The difference in the efficacy of altered stimulation parameters in whole-body-electromyostimulation training (WB-EMS) has hardly been examined. Higher impulse frequencies (>50 Hz) might be most adequate for strength gains because of the force frequency relationship (FFR), which describes a greater force production by increasing the applied frequency. Frequencies below this value, however, also seem to have positive influences on muscle strength increases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze possible muscle length changes to different stimulation frequencies of the dissected mouse triceps surae muscle. A bending rod transducer was used to measure and compare changes in muscle lengths at different frequencies in relation to the initial length in the prepared muscle. We found significant differences between the muscle shortening at different frequencies (p < 0.001). At 20 Hz the largest muscle shortening was observed (20 Hz = 3.32 ± 2.06, 60 Hz = 0.77 ± 0.58, 85 Hz = 0.32 ± 0.29, 100 Hz = 0.31 ± 0.29). From a frequency of 60 Hz, the muscle shortening decreased progressively, at stimulation frequencies above 60 Hz the lowest shortenings were recorded. The results demonstrate a different behavior of the isolated triceps surae muscle of the mouse in an ex vivo environment. Even if there is no FFR in this investigation, the results indicate a higher metabolic demand using higher frequencies in electromyostimulation, despite the experimental execution in ex vivo design. Therefore, future studies should take this faster fatigue into account when drawing up training protocols in order to counteract possible frequency modulations.

Highlights

  • Electromyostimulation (EMS) training has been an effective form of strength training for many years both in rehabilitation and in competitive and popular sports

  • The results demonstrate a different behavior of the isolated triceps surae muscle of the mouse in an ex vivo environment

  • Even if there is no force frequency relationship (FFR) in this investigation, the results indicate a higher metabolic demand using higher frequencies in electromyostimulation, despite the experimental execution in ex vivo design

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electromyostimulation (EMS) training has been an effective form of strength training for many years both in rehabilitation and in competitive and popular sports. A stimulation parameter whose influence on the effectiveness of EMS training has not yet been sufficiently clarified is the stimulation frequency. Optimal force increases seem to take place at a frequency in the range of 76.4 ± 20.9 Hz (Filipovic et al, 2011). More than 50 Hz seem to be necessary to generate optimal force increases, since at Frequency-Dependent Mouse Muscle Stimulation a frequency below 50 Hz mainly slower Type I fibers and from 50-120 Hz mainly faster Type II fibers are supposed to be stimulated (Frenkel et al, 2004). According to Kramme (2007), optimal faradic stimulation of the striated musculature occurs from 50 Hz, while Moreno-Aranda and Seireg (1981) were able to generate maximum electrical muscle activity at a frequency in the range between 50 and 110 Hz. frequency ranges below 50 Hz are considered to have a positive influence on force increases. Frequency ranges below 50 Hz are considered to have a positive influence on force increases. Dreibati et al (2010) recommend a stimulation frequency below 60 Hz in order to prevent a loss of strength during training

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.