Abstract

The percentage of patients with clinical total anterior circulation infarct (TACI) syndrome treated with reperfusion therapies in the absence of intracranial large-vessel occlusion (ILVO) was determined and their characteristics and outcome are described. Data from a population-based, prospective, externally audited registry of all stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapies in Catalonia from January 2011 to December 2013 were used. Patients with a baseline TACI and initial stroke severity measured by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 8, evaluated less than 4.5 h post-onset, for whom a vascular study prior to treatment was available (n = 1070) were selected. Clinical characteristics, outcome and radiological data for patients treated with IVT alone (n = 605) were compared between those with detected ILVO (n = 474) and non-ILVO patients (n = 131). A total of 1070 patients met study criteria; non-ILVO was found in 131 (12.2%). Analysing the 605 patients treated only with IVT, no significant differences were found between non-ILVO and ILVO patients in age, sex, risk factors, time-to-treatment and type of radiological studies performed. Although non-ILVO patients had lower initial stroke severity (P < 0.001) and a better prognosis (P = 0.001), 51.3% had a poor outcome and 16% were deceased at 90 days. In 66.4% of patients without ILVO, a recent anterior territorial infarct was detected. Intracranial artery patency was observed in 12.2% of TACI patients evaluated within 4.5 h. Although absence of ILVO was associated with slightly better prognosis, more than half had a poor outcome at 3 months.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.