Abstract

When do states ally against a common threat despite ideological differences? This question presents a puzzle for two prominent theories of international relations. Realists expect that ideology animosity is no barrier to alliance formation, while ideological arguments expect that it is an insuperable obstacle. Mark L. Haas’s answer to this important and relevant puzzle provides new insights for scholars and policymakers to consider. First, Haas argues that external threat is necessary but insufficient for ideological opponents to ally (20). In addition to an external threat pushing together two countries that ideological disagreements would otherwise pull apart, leaders must perceive low domestic political risks and a favorable ideological configuration in the international system (50). If leaders expect that security cooperation will embolden domestic revolutionaries and endanger their hold on power, they will not risk a “frenemy” alliance (24). Leaders must also believe that one country is their greatest ideological and material threat or that they can wedge apart states with similar ideologies as an “ideological outsider” (39).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.